MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with different specifications and features. Let's compare them.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features a combination of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The difference in clock speeds and Cortex cores can impact performance and power consumption.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, which is the latest architecture for ARM processors. This allows for better compatibility with modern applications and software.
The lithography, which refers to the size of transistors on the processor, also differs between the two. The Unisoc Tiger T610 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and performance.
When it comes to TDP (Thermal Design Power), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates the amount of heat generated by the processor under normal operational conditions. A lower TDP allows for cooler and more efficient operation.
One notable difference between the two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 930. This specialized hardware accelerates AI-related tasks, such as image recognition and machine learning, resulting in improved performance in these areas.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 have similarities in terms of CPU cores, architecture, instruction set, and TDP, they differ in lithography and the inclusion of an NPU. The MediaTek Dimensity 930's smaller lithography and NPU make it a more advanced and powerful processor particularly in AI-related tasks, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 may offer better power efficiency due to its larger lithography. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or the device they are being used in.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features a combination of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 has 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The difference in clock speeds and Cortex cores can impact performance and power consumption.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, which is the latest architecture for ARM processors. This allows for better compatibility with modern applications and software.
The lithography, which refers to the size of transistors on the processor, also differs between the two. The Unisoc Tiger T610 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally means better power efficiency and performance.
When it comes to TDP (Thermal Design Power), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates the amount of heat generated by the processor under normal operational conditions. A lower TDP allows for cooler and more efficient operation.
One notable difference between the two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 930. This specialized hardware accelerates AI-related tasks, such as image recognition and machine learning, resulting in improved performance in these areas.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 have similarities in terms of CPU cores, architecture, instruction set, and TDP, they differ in lithography and the inclusion of an NPU. The MediaTek Dimensity 930's smaller lithography and NPU make it a more advanced and powerful processor particularly in AI-related tasks, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 may offer better power efficiency due to its larger lithography. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user or the device they are being used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | T610 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Helio G90T
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
3
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
4
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
6
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 990
7
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
9
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio G85
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Samsung Exynos 2100