MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors that offer different specifications and features.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, this processor has a total of eight cores, with an architecture that includes 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for this processor is 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption level. Overall, this processor offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also features eight cores, but its architecture includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor utilizes ARMv8.2-A instruction set like the Unisoc Tiger T606. However, it stands out with a more advanced lithography of 6 nm, implying a more efficient chip design that could lead to better power consumption and heat management. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of core speeds and lithography. With its Cortex-A78 cores and 6 nm lithography, the Dimensity 930 offers potentially higher performance and better power efficiency. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 930 makes it more suitable for AI and ML tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 still provides a capable and balanced performance with its Cortex-A75 cores and 12 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended use-case.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, this processor has a total of eight cores, with an architecture that includes 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for this processor is 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption level. Overall, this processor offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also features eight cores, but its architecture includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor utilizes ARMv8.2-A instruction set like the Unisoc Tiger T606. However, it stands out with a more advanced lithography of 6 nm, implying a more efficient chip design that could lead to better power consumption and heat management. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of core speeds and lithography. With its Cortex-A78 cores and 6 nm lithography, the Dimensity 930 offers potentially higher performance and better power efficiency. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 930 makes it more suitable for AI and ML tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 still provides a capable and balanced performance with its Cortex-A75 cores and 12 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended use-case.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | |
| Shaders | 16 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
| Partnumber | T606 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
3
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
4
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Helio G50
5
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
7
Unisoc T9100 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs MediaTek Helio A22
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Helio P65
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs MediaTek Helio G99