MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors that offer different specifications and features.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, this processor has a total of eight cores, with an architecture that includes 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for this processor is 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption level. Overall, this processor offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also features eight cores, but its architecture includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor utilizes ARMv8.2-A instruction set like the Unisoc Tiger T606. However, it stands out with a more advanced lithography of 6 nm, implying a more efficient chip design that could lead to better power consumption and heat management. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of core speeds and lithography. With its Cortex-A78 cores and 6 nm lithography, the Dimensity 930 offers potentially higher performance and better power efficiency. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 930 makes it more suitable for AI and ML tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 still provides a capable and balanced performance with its Cortex-A75 cores and 12 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended use-case.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, this processor has a total of eight cores, with an architecture that includes 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for this processor is 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption level. Overall, this processor offers a balanced combination of performance and efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also features eight cores, but its architecture includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor utilizes ARMv8.2-A instruction set like the Unisoc Tiger T606. However, it stands out with a more advanced lithography of 6 nm, implying a more efficient chip design that could lead to better power consumption and heat management. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its performance in tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In summary, while both processors have eight cores and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T606 in terms of core speeds and lithography. With its Cortex-A78 cores and 6 nm lithography, the Dimensity 930 offers potentially higher performance and better power efficiency. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 930 makes it more suitable for AI and ML tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 still provides a capable and balanced performance with its Cortex-A75 cores and 12 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended use-case.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | T606 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
2
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
3
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
4
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
6
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
7
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
9
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B