MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors that cater to different types of users, each with its own set of unique specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it is a quad-core processor with an architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 is an octa-core processor that boasts a more powerful architecture. It comprises 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing increased performance capabilities. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller lithography of 6 nm, the Dimensity 930 offers a significant improvement in power efficiency.
Additionally, the Dimensity 930 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that it consumes less energy and generates less heat compared to the Tiger T310. This further enhances its energy efficiency and makes it suitable for devices requiring extended battery life.
Moreover, the Dimensity 930 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of an NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This specialized hardware accelerator enables advanced AI (Artificial Intelligence) tasks, such as image recognition and natural language processing, to be processed faster and more efficiently.
While both processors share the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 930's higher clock speeds, lower lithography, and additional AI capabilities give it the edge in terms of overall performance and efficiency. It is likely to excel in tasks that demand heavy processing, such as gaming and multimedia applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors offer distinct features and specifications. While the Tiger T310 provides a balanced performance, the Dimensity 930 outperforms it in terms of raw power, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities. Ultimately, users should consider their specific requirements and desired usage before selecting the ideal processor.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it is a quad-core processor with an architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 is an octa-core processor that boasts a more powerful architecture. It comprises 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing increased performance capabilities. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a smaller lithography of 6 nm, the Dimensity 930 offers a significant improvement in power efficiency.
Additionally, the Dimensity 930 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that it consumes less energy and generates less heat compared to the Tiger T310. This further enhances its energy efficiency and makes it suitable for devices requiring extended battery life.
Moreover, the Dimensity 930 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of an NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This specialized hardware accelerator enables advanced AI (Artificial Intelligence) tasks, such as image recognition and natural language processing, to be processed faster and more efficiently.
While both processors share the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 930's higher clock speeds, lower lithography, and additional AI capabilities give it the edge in terms of overall performance and efficiency. It is likely to excel in tasks that demand heavy processing, such as gaming and multimedia applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors offer distinct features and specifications. While the Tiger T310 provides a balanced performance, the Dimensity 930 outperforms it in terms of raw power, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities. Ultimately, users should consider their specific requirements and desired usage before selecting the ideal processor.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2019 April |
Partnumber | T310 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Apple A10 Fusion
2
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
3
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
5
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
6
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
8
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
9
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Apple A10X Fusion
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P35