MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G, it has a total of 8 CPU cores, with an architecture consisting of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 6 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 5 Watts. Additionally, it also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also has 8 CPU cores. Its architecture is made up of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tanggula T770, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 6 nm. However, the TDP of the Dimensity 930 is slightly higher, at 10 Watts. Like the T770, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
Comparing the two processors, the Tanggula T770 has a higher clock speed for its highest-performing core (2.5 GHz) compared to the Dimensity 930 (2.2 GHz). However, the Dimensity 930 has two Cortex-A78 cores, which are more powerful than the Cortex-A76 cores found in the Tanggula T770. The number and configuration of the Cortex-A55 cores are the same in both processors.
In terms of power consumption, the Tanggula T770 has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, indicating that it may be more power-efficient than the Dimensity 930, which has a TDP of 10 Watts.
Both processors feature an NPU, which enhances their capability for handling AI-related tasks.
Overall, the Tanggula T770 and the Dimensity 930 have similarities in their architecture, lithography, and NPU functionality, but they differ in their CPU core configuration, clock speeds, and power consumption. These variations may impact the performance, power efficiency, and thermal management of devices utilizing these processors.
Starting with the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G, it has a total of 8 CPU cores, with an architecture consisting of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, and it has a lithography of 6 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 5 Watts. Additionally, it also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 also has 8 CPU cores. Its architecture is made up of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tanggula T770, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 6 nm. However, the TDP of the Dimensity 930 is slightly higher, at 10 Watts. Like the T770, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
Comparing the two processors, the Tanggula T770 has a higher clock speed for its highest-performing core (2.5 GHz) compared to the Dimensity 930 (2.2 GHz). However, the Dimensity 930 has two Cortex-A78 cores, which are more powerful than the Cortex-A76 cores found in the Tanggula T770. The number and configuration of the Cortex-A55 cores are the same in both processors.
In terms of power consumption, the Tanggula T770 has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, indicating that it may be more power-efficient than the Dimensity 930, which has a TDP of 10 Watts.
Both processors feature an NPU, which enhances their capability for handling AI-related tasks.
Overall, the Tanggula T770 and the Dimensity 930 have similarities in their architecture, lithography, and NPU functionality, but they differ in their CPU core configuration, clock speeds, and power consumption. These variations may impact the performance, power efficiency, and thermal management of devices utilizing these processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G90T vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
3
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Unisoc SC9863A
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Apple A15 Bionic
5
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
7
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Apple A14 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Helio G35
10
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 9810