MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with distinct specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9863A is equipped with a 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core configuration, as well as a 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core setup. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts a 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 dual-core arrangement paired with a 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 hexa-core configuration. Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities.
When considering instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, highlighting their compatibility with modern software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc SC9863A adopts a 28 nm manufacturing process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 930 suggests improved power efficiency and overall performance compared to the SC9863A.
In terms of power consumption, the SC9863A has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts, consuming minimal energy during operation. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 has a higher TDP of 10 watts, which could indicate a higher power consumption when compared to the SC9863A.
Both processors are equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), ensuring enhanced AI capabilities and improved machine learning performance.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors differ in several key specifications. While the SC9863A has a lower lithography and TDP, the Dimensity 930 boasts a more advanced architecture and potentially higher performance. Choosing between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended application.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9863A is equipped with a 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core configuration, as well as a 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core setup. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts a 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 dual-core arrangement paired with a 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 hexa-core configuration. Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities.
When considering instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, highlighting their compatibility with modern software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc SC9863A adopts a 28 nm manufacturing process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 930 suggests improved power efficiency and overall performance compared to the SC9863A.
In terms of power consumption, the SC9863A has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts, consuming minimal energy during operation. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 has a higher TDP of 10 watts, which could indicate a higher power consumption when compared to the SC9863A.
Both processors are equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), ensuring enhanced AI capabilities and improved machine learning performance.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors differ in several key specifications. While the SC9863A has a lower lithography and TDP, the Dimensity 930 boasts a more advanced architecture and potentially higher performance. Choosing between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended application.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 3 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
| GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | |
| Shaders | 128 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2018 November |
| Partnumber | SC9863A | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
2
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
4
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
6
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
7
Google Tensor G4 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
8
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
9
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
10
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Unisoc Tiger T612