MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with distinct specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9863A is equipped with a 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core configuration, as well as a 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core setup. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts a 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 dual-core arrangement paired with a 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 hexa-core configuration. Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities.
When considering instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, highlighting their compatibility with modern software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc SC9863A adopts a 28 nm manufacturing process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 930 suggests improved power efficiency and overall performance compared to the SC9863A.
In terms of power consumption, the SC9863A has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts, consuming minimal energy during operation. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 has a higher TDP of 10 watts, which could indicate a higher power consumption when compared to the SC9863A.
Both processors are equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), ensuring enhanced AI capabilities and improved machine learning performance.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors differ in several key specifications. While the SC9863A has a lower lithography and TDP, the Dimensity 930 boasts a more advanced architecture and potentially higher performance. Choosing between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended application.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9863A is equipped with a 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core configuration, as well as a 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 quad-core setup. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts a 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 dual-core arrangement paired with a 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 hexa-core configuration. Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring efficient multitasking capabilities.
When considering instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, highlighting their compatibility with modern software and applications.
Moving on to lithography, the Unisoc SC9863A adopts a 28 nm manufacturing process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 930 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 930 suggests improved power efficiency and overall performance compared to the SC9863A.
In terms of power consumption, the SC9863A has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts, consuming minimal energy during operation. On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 has a higher TDP of 10 watts, which could indicate a higher power consumption when compared to the SC9863A.
Both processors are equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), ensuring enhanced AI capabilities and improved machine learning performance.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors differ in several key specifications. While the SC9863A has a lower lithography and TDP, the Dimensity 930 boasts a more advanced architecture and potentially higher performance. Choosing between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended application.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 128 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | SC9863A | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
2
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
3
Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
4
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
5
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
6
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio G85
9
Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A16 Bionic
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612