MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are both powerful processors that have their own unique specifications. Let's compare them.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, there are some differences in their CPU architecture. The Unisoc Tiger T618 consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 features 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This suggests that the Dimensity 920 may have a slight edge in terms of CPU performance due to its higher clock speed and the use of Cortex-A78 cores.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally leads to better power efficiency and performance. Therefore, the Dimensity 920 might have an advantage in terms of efficiency and power consumption.
Another key aspect to consider is the neural processing capability. Both the Tiger T618 and Dimensity 920 feature Neural Processing Units (NPU), which helps enhance AI and machine learning tasks. However, without detailed information about their respective NPUs, it is difficult to make a definitive comparison in this aspect.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), both processors have a similar power consumption of 10 Watts. This indicates that they have a similar thermal output and overall power efficiency.
To summarize, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 seems to have an advantage in terms of CPU performance due to its higher clock speed and Cortex-A78 cores. Additionally, its smaller lithography promises better power efficiency. However, without further information on the specifics of their NPUs, it is challenging to determine the superiority in terms of AI and machine learning tasks. Overall, both processors offer competitive specifications and are capable of delivering strong performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, there are some differences in their CPU architecture. The Unisoc Tiger T618 consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 features 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This suggests that the Dimensity 920 may have a slight edge in terms of CPU performance due to its higher clock speed and the use of Cortex-A78 cores.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally leads to better power efficiency and performance. Therefore, the Dimensity 920 might have an advantage in terms of efficiency and power consumption.
Another key aspect to consider is the neural processing capability. Both the Tiger T618 and Dimensity 920 feature Neural Processing Units (NPU), which helps enhance AI and machine learning tasks. However, without detailed information about their respective NPUs, it is difficult to make a definitive comparison in this aspect.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), both processors have a similar power consumption of 10 Watts. This indicates that they have a similar thermal output and overall power efficiency.
To summarize, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 seems to have an advantage in terms of CPU performance due to its higher clock speed and Cortex-A78 cores. Additionally, its smaller lithography promises better power efficiency. However, without further information on the specifics of their NPUs, it is challenging to determine the superiority in terms of AI and machine learning tasks. Overall, both processors offer competitive specifications and are capable of delivering strong performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio G90
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
4
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
5
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
6
MediaTek Helio G85 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
7
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
9
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Helio G35
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Unisoc Tiger T310