MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors, several key specifications stand out.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, there are differences in the specific cores and clock speeds. The Tiger T616 boasts a configuration of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 offers 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 may have slightly better performance capabilities, especially with its higher clock speed on the primary cores.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography. The Tiger T616 utilizes a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, which can be beneficial in mobile devices.
Both processors share the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they have similar power consumption levels and thermal characteristics. However, it is worth noting that the Dimensity 920 includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can significantly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities. This can be advantageous for tasks such as image recognition, voice commands, and augmented reality applications.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 have 8 CPU cores and feature the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, there are notable differences in their architectural configurations, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. The Dimensity 920 stands out with its higher clock speed on the primary cores, more advanced 6 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, there are differences in the specific cores and clock speeds. The Tiger T616 boasts a configuration of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 offers 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 may have slightly better performance capabilities, especially with its higher clock speed on the primary cores.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography. The Tiger T616 utilizes a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, which can be beneficial in mobile devices.
Both processors share the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they have similar power consumption levels and thermal characteristics. However, it is worth noting that the Dimensity 920 includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can significantly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities. This can be advantageous for tasks such as image recognition, voice commands, and augmented reality applications.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 have 8 CPU cores and feature the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, there are notable differences in their architectural configurations, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. The Dimensity 920 stands out with its higher clock speed on the primary cores, more advanced 6 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 96 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 |
| Partnumber | MT6877T | T616 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Apple A16 Bionic
2
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 vs Apple A10 Fusion
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
5
Apple M3 (iPad) vs MediaTek Helio P22
6
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7360 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
9
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
10
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 7904