MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors, several key specifications stand out.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, there are differences in the specific cores and clock speeds. The Tiger T616 boasts a configuration of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 offers 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 may have slightly better performance capabilities, especially with its higher clock speed on the primary cores.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography. The Tiger T616 utilizes a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, which can be beneficial in mobile devices.
Both processors share the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they have similar power consumption levels and thermal characteristics. However, it is worth noting that the Dimensity 920 includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can significantly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities. This can be advantageous for tasks such as image recognition, voice commands, and augmented reality applications.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 have 8 CPU cores and feature the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, there are notable differences in their architectural configurations, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. The Dimensity 920 stands out with its higher clock speed on the primary cores, more advanced 6 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, there are differences in the specific cores and clock speeds. The Tiger T616 boasts a configuration of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 offers 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 may have slightly better performance capabilities, especially with its higher clock speed on the primary cores.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography. The Tiger T616 utilizes a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, which can be beneficial in mobile devices.
Both processors share the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they have similar power consumption levels and thermal characteristics. However, it is worth noting that the Dimensity 920 includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can significantly enhance AI and machine learning capabilities. This can be advantageous for tasks such as image recognition, voice commands, and augmented reality applications.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 have 8 CPU cores and feature the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, there are notable differences in their architectural configurations, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. The Dimensity 920 stands out with its higher clock speed on the primary cores, more advanced 6 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs MediaTek Helio G96
2
MediaTek Helio G80 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
6
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
7
MediaTek Helio G25 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
10
MediaTek Helio P70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F