MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are both powerful processors with their own unique specifications. Let's compare them in terms of architecture, CPU cores, instruction set, lithography, TDP, and additional features.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature an octa-core configuration. However, the cores and their clock speeds differ. The Unisoc Tiger T612 has 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This implies that the Dimensity 920 may offer better performance due to its higher clock speeds.
Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software. However, they differ in terms of lithography. The Unisoc Tiger T612 is built on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 920 is manufactured on a more advanced 6 nm process. The latter's smaller node size suggests improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
When it comes to power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates that they are designed to deliver excellent performance without excessive energy requirements, making them suitable for mobile devices and other power-constrained applications.
In terms of additional features, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware component enables machine-learning tasks and AI-related applications, offering enhanced capabilities compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are formidable processors, the Dimensity 920 holds a slight advantage in terms of clock speeds, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, the Tiger T612 shouldn't be dismissed as it still offers a competitive octa-core configuration and compatibility with the latest instruction set architecture. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors will depend on specific requirements and use cases.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature an octa-core configuration. However, the cores and their clock speeds differ. The Unisoc Tiger T612 has 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This implies that the Dimensity 920 may offer better performance due to its higher clock speeds.
Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software. However, they differ in terms of lithography. The Unisoc Tiger T612 is built on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 920 is manufactured on a more advanced 6 nm process. The latter's smaller node size suggests improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
When it comes to power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates that they are designed to deliver excellent performance without excessive energy requirements, making them suitable for mobile devices and other power-constrained applications.
In terms of additional features, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware component enables machine-learning tasks and AI-related applications, offering enhanced capabilities compared to the Unisoc Tiger T612.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are formidable processors, the Dimensity 920 holds a slight advantage in terms of clock speeds, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, the Tiger T612 shouldn't be dismissed as it still offers a competitive octa-core configuration and compatibility with the latest instruction set architecture. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors will depend on specific requirements and use cases.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
3
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
4
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Helio G35
7
Unisoc SC9832E vs Apple A10 Fusion
8
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
9
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Helio P65