MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are both octa-core processors with similar power consumption of 10 Watts. However, there are notable differences in their specifications.
In terms of architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 920 may deliver higher performance due to its faster clock speeds and more advanced Cortex-A78 cores.
The lithography also varies between the two processors. The Unisoc Tiger T610 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the MediaTek Dimensity 920 utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller the lithography, the more efficient the processor tends to be, offering improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
One distinguishing feature of the MediaTek Dimensity 920 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU allows for accelerated machine learning tasks, enhancing AI capabilities and enabling faster and more advanced AI processing. The Unisoc Tiger T610, on the other hand, does not have this additional neural processing feature.
Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is commonly used in modern processors. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
Overall, while both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are octa-core processors with a 10 Watt TDP, the Dimensity 920 appears to offer superior performance with its faster clock speeds, more advanced architecture, and smaller lithography. Additionally, the presence of an NPU gives the Dimensity 920 an edge in AI-related tasks. However, the choice between these processors ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences, such as specific use cases and budget considerations.
In terms of architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 920 may deliver higher performance due to its faster clock speeds and more advanced Cortex-A78 cores.
The lithography also varies between the two processors. The Unisoc Tiger T610 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the MediaTek Dimensity 920 utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller the lithography, the more efficient the processor tends to be, offering improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
One distinguishing feature of the MediaTek Dimensity 920 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU allows for accelerated machine learning tasks, enhancing AI capabilities and enabling faster and more advanced AI processing. The Unisoc Tiger T610, on the other hand, does not have this additional neural processing feature.
Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is commonly used in modern processors. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
Overall, while both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are octa-core processors with a 10 Watt TDP, the Dimensity 920 appears to offer superior performance with its faster clock speeds, more advanced architecture, and smaller lithography. Additionally, the presence of an NPU gives the Dimensity 920 an edge in AI-related tasks. However, the choice between these processors ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences, such as specific use cases and budget considerations.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 850
2
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
4
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Helio G85
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Helio P35
10
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Helio A25