MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a 4-core architecture with each core running at a speed of 1.4 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built on a 28 nm lithography process. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts, this processor aims to balance performance and power efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture. It combines 2 high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This 8-core configuration allows for enhanced multitasking and better overall performance. The Dimensity 920 also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is fabricated on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. With a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts, this processor offers greater processing power.
In addition to CPU performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware is designed specifically for AI-related tasks, improving machine learning and AI processing capabilities. Although the Unisoc SC9832E does not have a dedicated NPU, it can still handle basic AI tasks thanks to its Cortex-A53 architecture.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9832E is a 4-core processor with a lower TDP and older lithography process, ideal for budget-friendly devices that prioritize power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 is an 8-core processor with a higher TDP and advanced lithography process, delivering better overall performance and incorporating an NPU for superior AI capabilities. Depending on the specific requirements of a device, either processor can be a suitable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a 4-core architecture with each core running at a speed of 1.4 GHz. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built on a 28 nm lithography process. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts, this processor aims to balance performance and power efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture. It combines 2 high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This 8-core configuration allows for enhanced multitasking and better overall performance. The Dimensity 920 also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is fabricated on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. With a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts, this processor offers greater processing power.
In addition to CPU performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware is designed specifically for AI-related tasks, improving machine learning and AI processing capabilities. Although the Unisoc SC9832E does not have a dedicated NPU, it can still handle basic AI tasks thanks to its Cortex-A53 architecture.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9832E is a 4-core processor with a lower TDP and older lithography process, ideal for budget-friendly devices that prioritize power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 is an 8-core processor with a higher TDP and advanced lithography process, delivering better overall performance and incorporating an NPU for superior AI capabilities. Depending on the specific requirements of a device, either processor can be a suitable choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2018 |
Partnumber | MT6877T | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
4
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
6
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
8
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Helio G90
9
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
10
Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G