MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc SC7731E
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors, several key differences emerge.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E features four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture with two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 is capable of higher performance and better multitasking capabilities.
The number of cores is another distinguishing factor. The SC7731E has four cores, while the Dimensity 920 has eight cores. More cores generally result in better performance, as tasks can be divided among multiple cores, leading to faster overall processing.
The instruction set is also worth considering. The SC7731E uses the ARMv7-A instruction set, which is older and less advanced compared to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set used by the Dimensity 920. This means that the Dimensity 920 supports more advanced features and optimizations.
Lithography refers to the manufacturing process used to create the chip. The SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a much smaller and more efficient 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography typically results in better power efficiency and improved thermal performance.
When comparing the thermal design power (TDP), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP may indicate that the Dimensity 920 generates more heat during operation.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is specifically designed to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks. The SC7731E does not have a dedicated NPU, indicating that the Dimensity 920 may outperform the SC7731E in AI-related workloads.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in several aspects, including architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a dedicated NPU. The Dimensity 920 is more powerful, efficient, and better suited for demanding tasks such as multitasking and AI algorithms.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E features four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture with two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 is capable of higher performance and better multitasking capabilities.
The number of cores is another distinguishing factor. The SC7731E has four cores, while the Dimensity 920 has eight cores. More cores generally result in better performance, as tasks can be divided among multiple cores, leading to faster overall processing.
The instruction set is also worth considering. The SC7731E uses the ARMv7-A instruction set, which is older and less advanced compared to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set used by the Dimensity 920. This means that the Dimensity 920 supports more advanced features and optimizations.
Lithography refers to the manufacturing process used to create the chip. The SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a much smaller and more efficient 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography typically results in better power efficiency and improved thermal performance.
When comparing the thermal design power (TDP), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP may indicate that the Dimensity 920 generates more heat during operation.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is specifically designed to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks. The SC7731E does not have a dedicated NPU, indicating that the Dimensity 920 may outperform the SC7731E in AI-related workloads.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in several aspects, including architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a dedicated NPU. The Dimensity 920 is more powerful, efficient, and better suited for demanding tasks such as multitasking and AI algorithms.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6877T | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T606
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
3
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Unisoc Tiger T612