MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc SC7731E
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors, several key differences emerge.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E features four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture with two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 is capable of higher performance and better multitasking capabilities.
The number of cores is another distinguishing factor. The SC7731E has four cores, while the Dimensity 920 has eight cores. More cores generally result in better performance, as tasks can be divided among multiple cores, leading to faster overall processing.
The instruction set is also worth considering. The SC7731E uses the ARMv7-A instruction set, which is older and less advanced compared to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set used by the Dimensity 920. This means that the Dimensity 920 supports more advanced features and optimizations.
Lithography refers to the manufacturing process used to create the chip. The SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a much smaller and more efficient 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography typically results in better power efficiency and improved thermal performance.
When comparing the thermal design power (TDP), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP may indicate that the Dimensity 920 generates more heat during operation.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is specifically designed to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks. The SC7731E does not have a dedicated NPU, indicating that the Dimensity 920 may outperform the SC7731E in AI-related workloads.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in several aspects, including architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a dedicated NPU. The Dimensity 920 is more powerful, efficient, and better suited for demanding tasks such as multitasking and AI algorithms.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E features four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture with two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 is capable of higher performance and better multitasking capabilities.
The number of cores is another distinguishing factor. The SC7731E has four cores, while the Dimensity 920 has eight cores. More cores generally result in better performance, as tasks can be divided among multiple cores, leading to faster overall processing.
The instruction set is also worth considering. The SC7731E uses the ARMv7-A instruction set, which is older and less advanced compared to the ARMv8.2-A instruction set used by the Dimensity 920. This means that the Dimensity 920 supports more advanced features and optimizations.
Lithography refers to the manufacturing process used to create the chip. The SC7731E has a 28 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a much smaller and more efficient 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography typically results in better power efficiency and improved thermal performance.
When comparing the thermal design power (TDP), the SC7731E has a TDP of 7 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. A higher TDP may indicate that the Dimensity 920 generates more heat during operation.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is specifically designed to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks. The SC7731E does not have a dedicated NPU, indicating that the Dimensity 920 may outperform the SC7731E in AI-related workloads.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in several aspects, including architecture, number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a dedicated NPU. The Dimensity 920 is more powerful, efficient, and better suited for demanding tasks such as multitasking and AI algorithms.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6877T | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
4
Apple M1 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
5
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
8
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
10
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636