MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
The MediaTek Dimensity 920 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors are both powerful and efficient options for mobile devices. While they share similar specifications, there are minor differences between the two.
Both processors are based on the same architecture and have 8 cores, with 2 high-performance Cortex-A78 cores and 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. This combination allows for a balance between performance and energy efficiency. Additionally, both processors have a 6 nm lithography, providing excellent power savings and a smaller footprint.
In terms of performance, there are slight differences. The MediaTek Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, with 2.5 GHz compared to the 2.2 GHz of the Dimensity 930. This could result in a small performance advantage for tasks that require more processing power.
However, it is important to note that clock speed alone does not determine overall performance. The efficiency and optimization of the processor's architecture also play a crucial role. Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
As for neural processing, both processors come with a built-in NPU (Neural Processing Unit) which enables faster and more efficient AI tasks, such as image recognition and voice commands.
Overall, the differences between the MediaTek Dimensity 920 and Dimensity 930 are minimal. The Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, offering a small performance advantage in certain tasks. However, both processors provide excellent performance and energy efficiency, making them suitable for a wide range of mobile devices.
Both processors are based on the same architecture and have 8 cores, with 2 high-performance Cortex-A78 cores and 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores. This combination allows for a balance between performance and energy efficiency. Additionally, both processors have a 6 nm lithography, providing excellent power savings and a smaller footprint.
In terms of performance, there are slight differences. The MediaTek Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, with 2.5 GHz compared to the 2.2 GHz of the Dimensity 930. This could result in a small performance advantage for tasks that require more processing power.
However, it is important to note that clock speed alone does not determine overall performance. The efficiency and optimization of the processor's architecture also play a crucial role. Both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
As for neural processing, both processors come with a built-in NPU (Neural Processing Unit) which enables faster and more efficient AI tasks, such as image recognition and voice commands.
Overall, the differences between the MediaTek Dimensity 920 and Dimensity 930 are minimal. The Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, offering a small performance advantage in certain tasks. However, both processors provide excellent performance and energy efficiency, making them suitable for a wide range of mobile devices.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | |
| Shaders | 96 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 2K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2022 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | MT6877T | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
3
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Unisoc SC9863A
4
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
5
Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 1380
6
Apple M5 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio A25
8
MediaTek Helio P35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821