MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are both processors designed for mobile devices. While they share similarities in terms of the number of cores, instruction set, and architecture, there are also notable differences in other specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a total of 8 cores divided into two clusters. The first cluster consists of 4 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, which are designed for high performance tasks. The second cluster includes 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz, providing efficiency for less demanding tasks. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 12 nm, this processor is capable of delivering reliable performance while maintaining power efficiency. Additionally, it boasts a Dual NPU for advanced neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 offers a similar configuration with its 8 cores, but with a different architecture and lithography. It consists of 2 highly performant Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.4 GHz, accompanied by 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz to handle less intensive tasks. The Dimensity 900 also supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a lithography of 6 nm, which indicates better power efficiency compared to the Tiger T710. Notably, it has an impressive number of 10000 million transistors, indicating a high level of integration and performance capability. Moreover, it offers an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In summary, both the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 processors have their own strengths. The Tiger T710 emphasizes balanced performance and power efficiency with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while also providing the advantage of a Dual NPU for advanced AI tasks. On the other hand, the Dimensity 900 excels in performance with its Cortex-A78 cores, alongside its impressive number of transistors and notable lithography, ensuring superior power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the mobile device.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a total of 8 cores divided into two clusters. The first cluster consists of 4 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, which are designed for high performance tasks. The second cluster includes 4 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz, providing efficiency for less demanding tasks. With an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 12 nm, this processor is capable of delivering reliable performance while maintaining power efficiency. Additionally, it boasts a Dual NPU for advanced neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 offers a similar configuration with its 8 cores, but with a different architecture and lithography. It consists of 2 highly performant Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.4 GHz, accompanied by 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz to handle less intensive tasks. The Dimensity 900 also supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a lithography of 6 nm, which indicates better power efficiency compared to the Tiger T710. Notably, it has an impressive number of 10000 million transistors, indicating a high level of integration and performance capability. Moreover, it offers an NPU for neural processing tasks.
In summary, both the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 processors have their own strengths. The Tiger T710 emphasizes balanced performance and power efficiency with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while also providing the advantage of a Dual NPU for advanced AI tasks. On the other hand, the Dimensity 900 excels in performance with its Cortex-A78 cores, alongside its impressive number of transistors and notable lithography, ensuring superior power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the mobile device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
3
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5
MediaTek Helio G90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Google Tensor G3
7
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
8
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
9
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Unisoc SC9863A
10
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Samsung Exynos 990