MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors that offer different specifications and features. Let's take a closer look at their specifications to understand their differences.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it is built on a 12 nm lithography process and features 8 cores. The CPU architecture includes 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A5 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. It also features 8 cores, but with a different CPU architecture. The Dimensity 900 includes 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Tiger T700, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, it boasts a neural processing unit (NPU) for improved AI performance.
In terms of raw performance, the Dimensity 900 may have an advantage with its faster Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz compared to the Tiger T700's Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. However, it's important to note that other factors, such as software optimization and overall system design, can also impact real-world performance.
Another notable difference is the lithography process. The Dimensity 900 utilizes a 6 nm process, which is more advanced and potentially more power-efficient compared to the Tiger T700's 12 nm process. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 boasts a larger number of transistors at 10,000 million, which can result in improved performance and efficiency.
In conclusion, while both processors offer octa-core configurations and support the same instruction set, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its more advanced lithography process, faster Cortex-A78 cores, and the additional neural processing unit for AI capabilities. However, real-world performance can vary depending on various factors, and it's important to consider overall system optimization when choosing a device powered by these processors.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it is built on a 12 nm lithography process and features 8 cores. The CPU architecture includes 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A5 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. It also features 8 cores, but with a different CPU architecture. The Dimensity 900 includes 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Tiger T700, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. Additionally, it boasts a neural processing unit (NPU) for improved AI performance.
In terms of raw performance, the Dimensity 900 may have an advantage with its faster Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz compared to the Tiger T700's Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. However, it's important to note that other factors, such as software optimization and overall system design, can also impact real-world performance.
Another notable difference is the lithography process. The Dimensity 900 utilizes a 6 nm process, which is more advanced and potentially more power-efficient compared to the Tiger T700's 12 nm process. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 boasts a larger number of transistors at 10,000 million, which can result in improved performance and efficiency.
In conclusion, while both processors offer octa-core configurations and support the same instruction set, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its more advanced lithography process, faster Cortex-A78 cores, and the additional neural processing unit for AI capabilities. However, real-world performance can vary depending on various factors, and it's important to consider overall system optimization when choosing a device powered by these processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 March |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
3
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
5
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
9
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MediaTek Helio G36
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821