MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 processors, it is evident that both have their own unique specifications and features.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This shows that the Dimensity 900 processor has a slightly higher clock speed and more powerful Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have 8 cores in total and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T612 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 900 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. This means that the Dimensity 900 processor is fabricated using a more modern and efficient process, leading to potentially better power consumption and overall performance.
The MediaTek Dimensity 900 also stands out with its neural processing unit (NPU), which the Tiger T612 lacks. The NPU in the Dimensity 900 improves the processor's artificial intelligence capabilities, allowing for more efficient handling of tasks related to machine learning and AI algorithms.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 900 processor is equipped with 10000 million transistors, providing it with a significant advantage in terms of transistor count over the Tiger T612. This increased transistor count can contribute to better overall performance and efficiency.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating that they have similar power consumption levels.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 processors share similarities in terms of number of cores and instruction set, the Dimensity 900 outshines the Tiger T612 with its higher clock speed, more powerful CPU cores, advanced 6 nm lithography, NPU for AI processing, and impressive transistor count. These factors make the Dimensity 900 a more capable and efficient processor compared to the Tiger T612.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This shows that the Dimensity 900 processor has a slightly higher clock speed and more powerful Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have 8 cores in total and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T612 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 900 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. This means that the Dimensity 900 processor is fabricated using a more modern and efficient process, leading to potentially better power consumption and overall performance.
The MediaTek Dimensity 900 also stands out with its neural processing unit (NPU), which the Tiger T612 lacks. The NPU in the Dimensity 900 improves the processor's artificial intelligence capabilities, allowing for more efficient handling of tasks related to machine learning and AI algorithms.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 900 processor is equipped with 10000 million transistors, providing it with a significant advantage in terms of transistor count over the Tiger T612. This increased transistor count can contribute to better overall performance and efficiency.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating that they have similar power consumption levels.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 processors share similarities in terms of number of cores and instruction set, the Dimensity 900 outshines the Tiger T612 with its higher clock speed, more powerful CPU cores, advanced 6 nm lithography, NPU for AI processing, and impressive transistor count. These factors make the Dimensity 900 a more capable and efficient processor compared to the Tiger T612.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek Helio P70
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
4
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
5
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
6
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
7
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Unisoc SC7731E
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
10
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865