MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors that offer different features and specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it has a total of eight cores with a combination of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and operates on a 12 nm lithography process. The TDP of this processor is 10 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 also has eight cores but with a different configuration. It consists of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T610, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 watts. However, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its 6 nm lithography process, which is more advanced than the 12 nm of the Tiger T610. Notably, the Dimensity 900 also includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its capabilities in artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
In terms of sheer processing power, the Dimensity 900 has an edge with its higher clock speeds and Cortex-A78 architecture. These improvements may result in better performance and faster processing for demanding tasks. Additionally, the 6 nm lithography process of the Dimensity 900 allows for more efficient power usage and potentially improved battery life compared to the Tiger T610's 12 nm process.
However, it's important to note that other factors such as software optimization, cooling solutions, and overall device design can also impact the actual performance and user experience. The choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency, AI capabilities, and budget.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 offer eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher clock speeds, advanced 6 nm lithography process, and the inclusion of an NPU.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it has a total of eight cores with a combination of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and operates on a 12 nm lithography process. The TDP of this processor is 10 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 also has eight cores but with a different configuration. It consists of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T610, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 watts. However, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its 6 nm lithography process, which is more advanced than the 12 nm of the Tiger T610. Notably, the Dimensity 900 also includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its capabilities in artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
In terms of sheer processing power, the Dimensity 900 has an edge with its higher clock speeds and Cortex-A78 architecture. These improvements may result in better performance and faster processing for demanding tasks. Additionally, the 6 nm lithography process of the Dimensity 900 allows for more efficient power usage and potentially improved battery life compared to the Tiger T610's 12 nm process.
However, it's important to note that other factors such as software optimization, cooling solutions, and overall device design can also impact the actual performance and user experience. The choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency, AI capabilities, and budget.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 offer eight cores and the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher clock speeds, advanced 6 nm lithography process, and the inclusion of an NPU.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A17 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
6
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
7
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
9
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
10
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710