MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are both processors used in various devices, and while they have similarities, they also have notable differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 has higher clock speeds for both its high-performance and power-efficient cores, potentially resulting in improved overall performance.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T606 adopts a 12 nm manufacturing process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography typically translates to better energy efficiency and improved heat dissipation in the processor.
When it comes to the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores in total. This allows for efficient multitasking and improved performance in handling multiple tasks simultaneously.
In terms of instruction set, both processors utilize ARMv8.2-A, indicating a compatibility with the latest software and applications that are optimized for this architecture.
Another notable difference is the presence of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This specialized component is specifically designed for handling artificial intelligence tasks, enabling faster and more efficient AI-related operations.
Lastly, both processors have the same thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watt. This indicates that they have similar power consumption and heat generation, resulting in a balanced trade-off between performance and energy efficiency.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 share commonalities in terms of the number of cores, instruction set, and TDP, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher clock speeds, advanced lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. These differences may result in improved overall performance and enhanced AI capabilities, making the Dimensity 900 a more enticing option for those seeking powerful and efficient processors for their devices.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 has higher clock speeds for both its high-performance and power-efficient cores, potentially resulting in improved overall performance.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T606 adopts a 12 nm manufacturing process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 employs a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography typically translates to better energy efficiency and improved heat dissipation in the processor.
When it comes to the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores in total. This allows for efficient multitasking and improved performance in handling multiple tasks simultaneously.
In terms of instruction set, both processors utilize ARMv8.2-A, indicating a compatibility with the latest software and applications that are optimized for this architecture.
Another notable difference is the presence of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This specialized component is specifically designed for handling artificial intelligence tasks, enabling faster and more efficient AI-related operations.
Lastly, both processors have the same thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watt. This indicates that they have similar power consumption and heat generation, resulting in a balanced trade-off between performance and energy efficiency.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 share commonalities in terms of the number of cores, instruction set, and TDP, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher clock speeds, advanced lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. These differences may result in improved overall performance and enhanced AI capabilities, making the Dimensity 900 a more enticing option for those seeking powerful and efficient processors for their devices.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2
Apple A13 Bionic vs Google Tensor G3
3
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
4
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Apple A12 Bionic
5
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
9
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
10
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480