MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The Unisoc SC7731E and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors with different specifications that cater to varying needs. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core architecture with Cortex-A7 CPUs clocked at 1.3 GHz. It operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set and has a TDP of 7 Watts. With a 28nm lithography, it offers an efficient performance while consuming less power.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 excels in several aspects. It is equipped with an octa-core architecture comprising of 2x Cortex-A78 CPUs clocked at 2.4 GHz, coupled with 6x Cortex-A55 CPUs clocked at 2.0 GHz. This combination allows for a balanced performance, providing both power and efficiency. Operating on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, it utilizes a 6nm lithography, making it more advanced than the Unisoc SC7731E.
In terms of transistors, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 outshines the Unisoc SC7731E with 10,000 million transistors. This abundance of transistors contributes to improved performance and enhanced capabilities, such as faster data processing.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware enables advanced artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, facilitating enhanced performance in tasks like image recognition, voice control, and natural language processing.
However, it's important to note that the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the Unisoc SC7731E.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 offers superior performance with its octa-core architecture, advanced lithography, ample transistors, and an NPU for AI capabilities. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E provides decent performance with its quad-core architecture and lower power consumption. The choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core architecture with Cortex-A7 CPUs clocked at 1.3 GHz. It operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set and has a TDP of 7 Watts. With a 28nm lithography, it offers an efficient performance while consuming less power.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 excels in several aspects. It is equipped with an octa-core architecture comprising of 2x Cortex-A78 CPUs clocked at 2.4 GHz, coupled with 6x Cortex-A55 CPUs clocked at 2.0 GHz. This combination allows for a balanced performance, providing both power and efficiency. Operating on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, it utilizes a 6nm lithography, making it more advanced than the Unisoc SC7731E.
In terms of transistors, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 outshines the Unisoc SC7731E with 10,000 million transistors. This abundance of transistors contributes to improved performance and enhanced capabilities, such as faster data processing.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware enables advanced artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, facilitating enhanced performance in tasks like image recognition, voice control, and natural language processing.
However, it's important to note that the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts compared to the Unisoc SC7731E.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 offers superior performance with its octa-core architecture, advanced lithography, ample transistors, and an NPU for AI capabilities. Meanwhile, the Unisoc SC7731E provides decent performance with its quad-core architecture and lower power consumption. The choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6877 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
2
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
3
Apple A10 Fusion vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
5
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
6
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
7
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G88
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685