MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are both powerful processors designed for mobile devices. While they share some similarities in terms of CPU cores and architecture, they also have notable differences in their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it has a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This provides a balanced performance with a total of eight cores. The processor is built on a 12 nm lithography, which offers decent power efficiency. One standout feature of the Tiger T710 is its Dual Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and enables tasks like facial recognition and real-time translations.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more powerful CPU architecture. It is equipped with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration delivers superior performance, especially in demanding tasks. The Dimensity 820 is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which results in improved power efficiency and better thermal management. Additionally, it has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its ability to handle heavy workloads without overheating. The Dimensity 820 also comes with an NPU, although it is not specified whether it is a dual NPU like the Tiger T710.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds and a more advanced lithography. This translates to improved performance and energy efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T710. However, the Tiger T710 has the advantage of a dedicated Dual NPU, which can provide better AI capabilities in certain applications.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities. If raw performance and power efficiency are of utmost importance, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 would be the better option. However, if AI-related tasks are a priority, the Unisoc Tiger T710 with its Dual NPU might be the more suitable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it has a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This provides a balanced performance with a total of eight cores. The processor is built on a 12 nm lithography, which offers decent power efficiency. One standout feature of the Tiger T710 is its Dual Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities and enables tasks like facial recognition and real-time translations.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more powerful CPU architecture. It is equipped with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration delivers superior performance, especially in demanding tasks. The Dimensity 820 is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography, which results in improved power efficiency and better thermal management. Additionally, it has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its ability to handle heavy workloads without overheating. The Dimensity 820 also comes with an NPU, although it is not specified whether it is a dual NPU like the Tiger T710.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds and a more advanced lithography. This translates to improved performance and energy efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T710. However, the Tiger T710 has the advantage of a dedicated Dual NPU, which can provide better AI capabilities in certain applications.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities. If raw performance and power efficiency are of utmost importance, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 would be the better option. However, if AI-related tasks are a priority, the Unisoc Tiger T710 with its Dual NPU might be the more suitable choice.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 5 | |
| Shaders | 80 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 May | 2019 |
| Partnumber | MT6875 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Apple A17 Pro
5
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Google Tensor G2
7
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
10
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810