MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc Tiger T700 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors, several differences stand out.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features an architecture of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In comparison, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance and faster processing speeds.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores, indicating that they are octa-core processors. However, the architecture plays a significant role in determining the overall performance of a processor.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally means more power efficiency and potentially better heat management.
Interestingly, both processors have the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts. This indicates that they have similar power consumption levels.
One notable difference is that the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is an AI accelerator that enhances the processor's ability to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, based on the specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 appears to be a more powerful and advanced processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. It offers higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and the added benefit of an NPU, which could provide better performance and efficiency in AI-related tasks. However, it's essential to consider real-world performance benchmarks and user experiences for a comprehensive comparison between these two processors.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features an architecture of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In comparison, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance and faster processing speeds.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores, indicating that they are octa-core processors. However, the architecture plays a significant role in determining the overall performance of a processor.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally means more power efficiency and potentially better heat management.
Interestingly, both processors have the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts. This indicates that they have similar power consumption levels.
One notable difference is that the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is an AI accelerator that enhances the processor's ability to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, based on the specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 appears to be a more powerful and advanced processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. It offers higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and the added benefit of an NPU, which could provide better performance and efficiency in AI-related tasks. However, it's essential to consider real-world performance benchmarks and user experiences for a comprehensive comparison between these two processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 2 |
Shaders | 80 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2021 March |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Apple A13 Bionic
3
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
4
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Helio G25
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs Apple A17 Pro
8
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
9
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs HiSilicon Kirin 960