MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc Tiger T700 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors, several differences stand out.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features an architecture of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In comparison, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance and faster processing speeds.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores, indicating that they are octa-core processors. However, the architecture plays a significant role in determining the overall performance of a processor.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally means more power efficiency and potentially better heat management.
Interestingly, both processors have the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts. This indicates that they have similar power consumption levels.
One notable difference is that the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is an AI accelerator that enhances the processor's ability to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, based on the specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 appears to be a more powerful and advanced processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. It offers higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and the added benefit of an NPU, which could provide better performance and efficiency in AI-related tasks. However, it's essential to consider real-world performance benchmarks and user experiences for a comprehensive comparison between these two processors.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features an architecture of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In comparison, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has a more powerful architecture with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance and faster processing speeds.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores, indicating that they are octa-core processors. However, the architecture plays a significant role in determining the overall performance of a processor.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a 12 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally means more power efficiency and potentially better heat management.
Interestingly, both processors have the same TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts. This indicates that they have similar power consumption levels.
One notable difference is that the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is an AI accelerator that enhances the processor's ability to handle artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, based on the specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 appears to be a more powerful and advanced processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. It offers higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and the added benefit of an NPU, which could provide better performance and efficiency in AI-related tasks. However, it's essential to consider real-world performance benchmarks and user experiences for a comprehensive comparison between these two processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 2 |
Shaders | 80 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2021 March |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
2
Apple A15 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
3
Unisoc SC7731E vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
4
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
5
MediaTek Helio G95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
6
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Google Tensor G1
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
10
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Helio G96