MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with notable specifications.
When considering CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering decent performance.
In terms of instruction set, both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 support ARMv8.2-A. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications that are optimized for ARM-based processors.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography process usually results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
Regarding power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates their power usage and heat dissipation capabilities. A lower TDP often implies a more efficient and cooler-running processor.
One additional aspect that sets the MediaTek Dimensity 820 apart is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated hardware accelerates machine learning tasks and offers enhanced AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T616, however, does not possess this feature.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 are octa-core processors with ARMv8.2-A instruction sets, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its more advanced 7 nm lithography process and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit for AI-related tasks. These specifications make the MediaTek Dimensity 820 a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T616.
When considering CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering decent performance.
In terms of instruction set, both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 support ARMv8.2-A. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications that are optimized for ARM-based processors.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography process usually results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
Regarding power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates their power usage and heat dissipation capabilities. A lower TDP often implies a more efficient and cooler-running processor.
One additional aspect that sets the MediaTek Dimensity 820 apart is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated hardware accelerates machine learning tasks and offers enhanced AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T616, however, does not possess this feature.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 are octa-core processors with ARMv8.2-A instruction sets, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its more advanced 7 nm lithography process and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit for AI-related tasks. These specifications make the MediaTek Dimensity 820 a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T616.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 5 | 1 |
| Shaders | 80 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 May | 2021 |
| Partnumber | MT6875 | T616 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
2
MediaTek Helio P70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
3
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Helio G96
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
5
Google Tensor G5 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
7
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Apple A19 Pro
9
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Google Tensor G1
10
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 1380