MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with notable specifications.
When considering CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering decent performance.
In terms of instruction set, both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 support ARMv8.2-A. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications that are optimized for ARM-based processors.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography process usually results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
Regarding power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates their power usage and heat dissipation capabilities. A lower TDP often implies a more efficient and cooler-running processor.
One additional aspect that sets the MediaTek Dimensity 820 apart is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated hardware accelerates machine learning tasks and offers enhanced AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T616, however, does not possess this feature.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 are octa-core processors with ARMv8.2-A instruction sets, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its more advanced 7 nm lithography process and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit for AI-related tasks. These specifications make the MediaTek Dimensity 820 a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T616.
When considering CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 includes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores in total, offering decent performance.
In terms of instruction set, both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 support ARMv8.2-A. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications that are optimized for ARM-based processors.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography process usually results in better power efficiency and improved performance.
Regarding power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts. This indicates their power usage and heat dissipation capabilities. A lower TDP often implies a more efficient and cooler-running processor.
One additional aspect that sets the MediaTek Dimensity 820 apart is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This dedicated hardware accelerates machine learning tasks and offers enhanced AI capabilities. The Unisoc Tiger T616, however, does not possess this feature.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T616 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 are octa-core processors with ARMv8.2-A instruction sets, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its more advanced 7 nm lithography process and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit for AI-related tasks. These specifications make the MediaTek Dimensity 820 a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T616.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 1 |
Shaders | 80 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2021 |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
2
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
3
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
4
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
7
MediaTek Helio A25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B