MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc Tiger T612 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors, a few key differences can be observed.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, adding up to a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also totaling 8 cores. In terms of clock speed, the Dimensity 820 offers higher performance with its faster Cortex-A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. However, there is a difference in the lithography process used in manufacturing the processors. The Tiger T612 is built on a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
The power consumption, indicated by the Thermal Design Power (TDP), is the same for both processors at 10 Watts. This suggests that both processors can operate within a similar power range, potentially making them suitable for a range of devices.
One notable distinction between the two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 820. This dedicated hardware is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks and AI-related computations, potentially enabling more efficient and faster AI processing compared to the Tiger T612.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 processor offers a balanced configuration with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 provides a higher performance with its Cortex-A76 cores and benefits from a smaller lithography and a dedicated NPU for AI-related tasks. The choice between the two would depend on specific performance requirements and the intended application of the processor.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, adding up to a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also totaling 8 cores. In terms of clock speed, the Dimensity 820 offers higher performance with its faster Cortex-A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. However, there is a difference in the lithography process used in manufacturing the processors. The Tiger T612 is built on a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
The power consumption, indicated by the Thermal Design Power (TDP), is the same for both processors at 10 Watts. This suggests that both processors can operate within a similar power range, potentially making them suitable for a range of devices.
One notable distinction between the two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 820. This dedicated hardware is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks and AI-related computations, potentially enabling more efficient and faster AI processing compared to the Tiger T612.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 processor offers a balanced configuration with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 provides a higher performance with its Cortex-A76 cores and benefits from a smaller lithography and a dedicated NPU for AI-related tasks. The choice between the two would depend on specific performance requirements and the intended application of the processor.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 1 |
Shaders | 80 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3
MediaTek Helio G200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 vs Apple M1 (iPad)
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Apple A16 Bionic
7
Apple A18 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
8
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Apple A10 Fusion
9
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 990
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662