MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc Tiger T612 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors, a few key differences can be observed.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, adding up to a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also totaling 8 cores. In terms of clock speed, the Dimensity 820 offers higher performance with its faster Cortex-A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. However, there is a difference in the lithography process used in manufacturing the processors. The Tiger T612 is built on a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
The power consumption, indicated by the Thermal Design Power (TDP), is the same for both processors at 10 Watts. This suggests that both processors can operate within a similar power range, potentially making them suitable for a range of devices.
One notable distinction between the two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 820. This dedicated hardware is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks and AI-related computations, potentially enabling more efficient and faster AI processing compared to the Tiger T612.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 processor offers a balanced configuration with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 provides a higher performance with its Cortex-A76 cores and benefits from a smaller lithography and a dedicated NPU for AI-related tasks. The choice between the two would depend on specific performance requirements and the intended application of the processor.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, adding up to a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also totaling 8 cores. In terms of clock speed, the Dimensity 820 offers higher performance with its faster Cortex-A76 cores compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. However, there is a difference in the lithography process used in manufacturing the processors. The Tiger T612 is built on a 12 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally indicates improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
The power consumption, indicated by the Thermal Design Power (TDP), is the same for both processors at 10 Watts. This suggests that both processors can operate within a similar power range, potentially making them suitable for a range of devices.
One notable distinction between the two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 820. This dedicated hardware is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks and AI-related computations, potentially enabling more efficient and faster AI processing compared to the Tiger T612.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 processor offers a balanced configuration with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 provides a higher performance with its Cortex-A76 cores and benefits from a smaller lithography and a dedicated NPU for AI-related tasks. The choice between the two would depend on specific performance requirements and the intended application of the processor.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 1 |
Shaders | 80 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
2
Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 8895
3
MediaTek Helio P35 vs MediaTek Helio G35
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
7
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Helio G85
8
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Apple A14 Bionic
10
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820