MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors, it is clear that both processors offer similar capabilities but with some notable differences.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 utilizes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has higher clock speeds and more powerful cores compared to the Tiger T610.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications and software. However, the Dimensity 820 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the Tiger T610's 12 nm process. The smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which enhances the processor's capabilities in artificial intelligence-related tasks. This could provide advantages in tasks such as image processing, machine learning, and voice recognition.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which indicates that they have similar power consumption levels. This means that devices equipped with either of these processors should provide reasonable battery life.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 showcases stronger CPU cores with faster clock speeds and a more advanced lithography process. Furthermore, its inclusion of an NPU grants it an edge in performing AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T610 still offers a decent performance and power efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The choice between these processors ultimately boils down to the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 utilizes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has higher clock speeds and more powerful cores compared to the Tiger T610.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications and software. However, the Dimensity 820 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the Tiger T610's 12 nm process. The smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which enhances the processor's capabilities in artificial intelligence-related tasks. This could provide advantages in tasks such as image processing, machine learning, and voice recognition.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which indicates that they have similar power consumption levels. This means that devices equipped with either of these processors should provide reasonable battery life.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 showcases stronger CPU cores with faster clock speeds and a more advanced lithography process. Furthermore, its inclusion of an NPU grants it an edge in performing AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T610 still offers a decent performance and power efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The choice between these processors ultimately boils down to the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
| Execution units | 5 | 2 |
| Shaders | 80 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 May | 2019 June |
| Partnumber | MT6875 | T610 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek MT6739
2
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs MediaTek Helio G85
5
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Helio P22
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
7
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
9
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G