MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors, it is clear that both processors offer similar capabilities but with some notable differences.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 utilizes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has higher clock speeds and more powerful cores compared to the Tiger T610.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications and software. However, the Dimensity 820 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the Tiger T610's 12 nm process. The smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which enhances the processor's capabilities in artificial intelligence-related tasks. This could provide advantages in tasks such as image processing, machine learning, and voice recognition.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which indicates that they have similar power consumption levels. This means that devices equipped with either of these processors should provide reasonable battery life.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 showcases stronger CPU cores with faster clock speeds and a more advanced lithography process. Furthermore, its inclusion of an NPU grants it an edge in performing AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T610 still offers a decent performance and power efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The choice between these processors ultimately boils down to the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 utilizes 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has higher clock speeds and more powerful cores compared to the Tiger T610.
Both processors have a total of 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with various applications and software. However, the Dimensity 820 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured on a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the Tiger T610's 12 nm process. The smaller lithography generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU) which enhances the processor's capabilities in artificial intelligence-related tasks. This could provide advantages in tasks such as image processing, machine learning, and voice recognition.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which indicates that they have similar power consumption levels. This means that devices equipped with either of these processors should provide reasonable battery life.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 showcases stronger CPU cores with faster clock speeds and a more advanced lithography process. Furthermore, its inclusion of an NPU grants it an edge in performing AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc Tiger T610 still offers a decent performance and power efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The choice between these processors ultimately boils down to the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 2 |
Shaders | 80 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
2
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
3
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio G25
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
7
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
8
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200