MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with distinct specifications, each offering their own benefits and features.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it boasts a CPU architecture comprising of 4 cores, including one 2GHz Cortex-A75 and three 1.8GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12nm. Though not specific, it does not mention any additional features like TDP or Neural Processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 offers a more robust architecture. It showcases a CPU architecture consisting of 8 cores, with four 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T310, it runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it surpasses the former in terms of lithography, boasting a superior 7nm lithography which generally indicates better performance and power efficiency. Moreover, it has a TDP of 10 Watts, which suggests a more energy-efficient design. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI-driven features and capabilities.
In summary, while both processors have their own strengths, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of its processing power, lower lithography, energy efficiency with its TDP, and the addition of an NPU which enhances its AI capabilities. However, it is important to note that other factors such as real-world performance and optimization also play a crucial role in determining the overall performance and user experience with these processors.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it boasts a CPU architecture comprising of 4 cores, including one 2GHz Cortex-A75 and three 1.8GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12nm. Though not specific, it does not mention any additional features like TDP or Neural Processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 offers a more robust architecture. It showcases a CPU architecture consisting of 8 cores, with four 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T310, it runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it surpasses the former in terms of lithography, boasting a superior 7nm lithography which generally indicates better performance and power efficiency. Moreover, it has a TDP of 10 Watts, which suggests a more energy-efficient design. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI-driven features and capabilities.
In summary, while both processors have their own strengths, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of its processing power, lower lithography, energy efficiency with its TDP, and the addition of an NPU which enhances its AI capabilities. However, it is important to note that other factors such as real-world performance and optimization also play a crucial role in determining the overall performance and user experience with these processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 2 |
Shaders | 80 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2019 April |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Helio P90
3
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
5
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
7
Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
8
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
9
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus