MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with distinct specifications, each offering their own benefits and features.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it boasts a CPU architecture comprising of 4 cores, including one 2GHz Cortex-A75 and three 1.8GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12nm. Though not specific, it does not mention any additional features like TDP or Neural Processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 offers a more robust architecture. It showcases a CPU architecture consisting of 8 cores, with four 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T310, it runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it surpasses the former in terms of lithography, boasting a superior 7nm lithography which generally indicates better performance and power efficiency. Moreover, it has a TDP of 10 Watts, which suggests a more energy-efficient design. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI-driven features and capabilities.
In summary, while both processors have their own strengths, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of its processing power, lower lithography, energy efficiency with its TDP, and the addition of an NPU which enhances its AI capabilities. However, it is important to note that other factors such as real-world performance and optimization also play a crucial role in determining the overall performance and user experience with these processors.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it boasts a CPU architecture comprising of 4 cores, including one 2GHz Cortex-A75 and three 1.8GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12nm. Though not specific, it does not mention any additional features like TDP or Neural Processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 offers a more robust architecture. It showcases a CPU architecture consisting of 8 cores, with four 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T310, it runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it surpasses the former in terms of lithography, boasting a superior 7nm lithography which generally indicates better performance and power efficiency. Moreover, it has a TDP of 10 Watts, which suggests a more energy-efficient design. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI-driven features and capabilities.
In summary, while both processors have their own strengths, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of its processing power, lower lithography, energy efficiency with its TDP, and the addition of an NPU which enhances its AI capabilities. However, it is important to note that other factors such as real-world performance and optimization also play a crucial role in determining the overall performance and user experience with these processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 2 |
Shaders | 80 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2019 April |
Partnumber | MT6875 | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 850
2
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
5
Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T612
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
7
Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
9
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
10
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Apple A11 Bionic