MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are both powerful processors with impressive specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T770 5G features an architecture of 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. It has a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 has an architecture of 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55, also with 8 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide array of software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Tanggula T770 5G boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography, which generally indicates better power efficiency and possibly better performance. In comparison, the Dimensity 820 has a 7 nm lithography, which is still quite impressive but slightly larger than the Tanggula T770 5G.
When it comes to TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, possibly making it more power-efficient compared to the Dimensity 820, which has a TDP of 10 Watts.
Both processors also include a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities. This allows for improved machine learning tasks and better AI performance.
In summary, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors have similar numbers of cores, use the same instruction set, and both have NPUs. However, the Tanggula T770 5G has a smaller lithography, giving it the potential for better power efficiency, while the Dimensity 820 has a higher TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on specific requirements and usage scenarios.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T770 5G features an architecture of 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. It has a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 has an architecture of 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55, also with 8 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide array of software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Tanggula T770 5G boasts a smaller 6 nm lithography, which generally indicates better power efficiency and possibly better performance. In comparison, the Dimensity 820 has a 7 nm lithography, which is still quite impressive but slightly larger than the Tanggula T770 5G.
When it comes to TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, possibly making it more power-efficient compared to the Dimensity 820, which has a TDP of 10 Watts.
Both processors also include a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities. This allows for improved machine learning tasks and better AI performance.
In summary, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors have similar numbers of cores, use the same instruction set, and both have NPUs. However, the Tanggula T770 5G has a smaller lithography, giving it the potential for better power efficiency, while the Dimensity 820 has a higher TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these processors may depend on specific requirements and usage scenarios.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 32 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 5 | 6 |
| Shaders | 80 | 96 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 May | 2021 February |
| Partnumber | MT6875 | T770, Tiger T7520 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs MediaTek Helio P22
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
4
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Helio G36
5
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Apple A19 Pro
8
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
9
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
10
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685