MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors that differ in terms of their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture, with four CPU cores. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 7 Watts.
In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more advanced architecture. It consists of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight CPU cores. It follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 7 nm. The TDP of this processor is slightly higher at 10 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which provides AI processing capabilities.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is likely to deliver better results due to its higher clock speed and more advanced architecture. The use of Cortex-A76 cores, known for their high performance, gives it an edge over the Unisoc SC9832E. The inclusion of the NPU also enhances its AI processing capabilities.
However, it is essential to consider power consumption as well. The Unisoc SC9832E is designed to operate at a lower TDP of 7 Watts, which can be more energy-efficient compared to the Dimensity 820, which operates at a TDP of 10 Watts.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device they are being used in. If performance and AI capabilities are crucial, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 would be the better option. On the other hand, if power efficiency is a priority, the Unisoc SC9832E may be the more suitable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it features a 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture, with four CPU cores. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of this processor is 7 Watts.
In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a more advanced architecture. It consists of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a total of eight CPU cores. It follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 7 nm. The TDP of this processor is slightly higher at 10 Watts. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which provides AI processing capabilities.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 is likely to deliver better results due to its higher clock speed and more advanced architecture. The use of Cortex-A76 cores, known for their high performance, gives it an edge over the Unisoc SC9832E. The inclusion of the NPU also enhances its AI processing capabilities.
However, it is essential to consider power consumption as well. The Unisoc SC9832E is designed to operate at a lower TDP of 7 Watts, which can be more energy-efficient compared to the Dimensity 820, which operates at a TDP of 10 Watts.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device they are being used in. If performance and AI capabilities are crucial, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 would be the better option. On the other hand, if power efficiency is a priority, the Unisoc SC9832E may be the more suitable choice.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 5 | 1 |
| Shaders | 80 | 4 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 13MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 May | 2018 |
| Partnumber | MT6875 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 vs Apple A15 Bionic
4
Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
6
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Apple M4 (iPad)
7
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Helio G99
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S