MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The Unisoc SC7731E and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a 4-core architecture, with each core clocking in at a speed of 1.3 GHz. The instruction set utilized is ARMv7-A, which is an older version. The lithography is 28 nm, indicating a slightly older manufacturing process. The thermal design power (TDP) is at 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts an 8-core architecture. It combines four high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.6 GHz with four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This configuration allows for improved multitasking and enhanced performance. It supports the upgraded ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling better efficiency and computing capabilities. The lithography of just 7 nm suggests a more advanced manufacturing process. The TDP is set at 10 Watts. Moreover, the Dimensity 820 also includes Neural Processing Units (NPU) to accelerate artificial intelligence-related tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, clock speed, instruction set, lithography, and additional features. With its 8 cores and newer Cortex-A76 and A55 architecture, the Dimensity 820 can handle more demanding tasks and offer improved performance. The use of a 7 nm manufacturing process further enhances efficiency and power consumption. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU greatly enhances AI-related functions.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc SC7731E may still be suitable for basic and low-power applications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 undoubtedly provides a more advanced and powerful solution.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a 4-core architecture, with each core clocking in at a speed of 1.3 GHz. The instruction set utilized is ARMv7-A, which is an older version. The lithography is 28 nm, indicating a slightly older manufacturing process. The thermal design power (TDP) is at 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts an 8-core architecture. It combines four high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.6 GHz with four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This configuration allows for improved multitasking and enhanced performance. It supports the upgraded ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling better efficiency and computing capabilities. The lithography of just 7 nm suggests a more advanced manufacturing process. The TDP is set at 10 Watts. Moreover, the Dimensity 820 also includes Neural Processing Units (NPU) to accelerate artificial intelligence-related tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, clock speed, instruction set, lithography, and additional features. With its 8 cores and newer Cortex-A76 and A55 architecture, the Dimensity 820 can handle more demanding tasks and offer improved performance. The use of a 7 nm manufacturing process further enhances efficiency and power consumption. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU greatly enhances AI-related functions.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc SC7731E may still be suitable for basic and low-power applications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 undoubtedly provides a more advanced and powerful solution.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution units | 5 | 1 |
| Shaders | 80 | 4 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 May | 2018 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | MT6875 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
4
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
6
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
8
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
9
Unisoc SC9863A vs Google Tensor G2
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 vs Unisoc SC9832E