MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The Unisoc SC7731E and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a 4-core architecture, with each core clocking in at a speed of 1.3 GHz. The instruction set utilized is ARMv7-A, which is an older version. The lithography is 28 nm, indicating a slightly older manufacturing process. The thermal design power (TDP) is at 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts an 8-core architecture. It combines four high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.6 GHz with four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This configuration allows for improved multitasking and enhanced performance. It supports the upgraded ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling better efficiency and computing capabilities. The lithography of just 7 nm suggests a more advanced manufacturing process. The TDP is set at 10 Watts. Moreover, the Dimensity 820 also includes Neural Processing Units (NPU) to accelerate artificial intelligence-related tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, clock speed, instruction set, lithography, and additional features. With its 8 cores and newer Cortex-A76 and A55 architecture, the Dimensity 820 can handle more demanding tasks and offer improved performance. The use of a 7 nm manufacturing process further enhances efficiency and power consumption. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU greatly enhances AI-related functions.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc SC7731E may still be suitable for basic and low-power applications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 undoubtedly provides a more advanced and powerful solution.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a 4-core architecture, with each core clocking in at a speed of 1.3 GHz. The instruction set utilized is ARMv7-A, which is an older version. The lithography is 28 nm, indicating a slightly older manufacturing process. The thermal design power (TDP) is at 7 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts an 8-core architecture. It combines four high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.6 GHz with four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This configuration allows for improved multitasking and enhanced performance. It supports the upgraded ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling better efficiency and computing capabilities. The lithography of just 7 nm suggests a more advanced manufacturing process. The TDP is set at 10 Watts. Moreover, the Dimensity 820 also includes Neural Processing Units (NPU) to accelerate artificial intelligence-related tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of architecture, clock speed, instruction set, lithography, and additional features. With its 8 cores and newer Cortex-A76 and A55 architecture, the Dimensity 820 can handle more demanding tasks and offer improved performance. The use of a 7 nm manufacturing process further enhances efficiency and power consumption. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU greatly enhances AI-related functions.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc SC7731E may still be suitable for basic and low-power applications, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 undoubtedly provides a more advanced and powerful solution.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 1 |
Shaders | 80 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6875 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
2
MediaTek Helio P95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
5
Apple A10 Fusion vs Unisoc SC7731E
6
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
9
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Apple A17 Pro
10
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Apple A11 Bionic