MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors with different specifications. Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55, totaling eight cores. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Notably, it is equipped with dual NPUs for enhanced neural processing.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has a different architecture, consisting of 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T710, it also has eight cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it surpasses the T710 with a smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. Additionally, it boasts 12000 million transistors, showcasing increased computational power. The Dimensity 810 also has a TDP (thermal design power) of 8 Watt, which suggests a relatively lower power consumption.
In terms of neural processing, the Tiger T710 incorporates dual NPUs, while the Dimensity 810 features a single NPU. Both processors aim to enhance AI capabilities and optimize performance for AI-driven applications.
While these processors have certain similarities, they also possess notable differences. The Dimensity 810's more advanced lithography and higher number of transistors may offer superior performance compared to the Tiger T710. However, the T710's dual NPUs can provide unique advantages in neural processing tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 would depend on specific requirements and priorities. The Tiger T710 may be suitable for applications with a stronger focus on neural processing, while the Dimensity 810 may excel in raw computational power and power efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has a different architecture, consisting of 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T710, it also has eight cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it surpasses the T710 with a smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. Additionally, it boasts 12000 million transistors, showcasing increased computational power. The Dimensity 810 also has a TDP (thermal design power) of 8 Watt, which suggests a relatively lower power consumption.
In terms of neural processing, the Tiger T710 incorporates dual NPUs, while the Dimensity 810 features a single NPU. Both processors aim to enhance AI capabilities and optimize performance for AI-driven applications.
While these processors have certain similarities, they also possess notable differences. The Dimensity 810's more advanced lithography and higher number of transistors may offer superior performance compared to the Tiger T710. However, the T710's dual NPUs can provide unique advantages in neural processing tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 would depend on specific requirements and priorities. The Tiger T710 may be suitable for applications with a stronger focus on neural processing, while the Dimensity 810 may excel in raw computational power and power efficiency.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2019 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Apple A15 Bionic
4
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Apple A10X Fusion
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 8890
8
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
9
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
10
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G