MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are both processors designed for mobile devices such as smartphones. While they share certain similarities, such as having 8 cores and being based on ARMv8.2-A instruction set, they also have distinct differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 810 may have a slight advantage in terms of raw processing power and overall performance due to higher clock speeds and a more powerful Cortex-A76 architecture.
Lithography and power consumption are significant factors in a processor's efficiency. The Unisoc Tiger T700 has a 12 nm lithography process and a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a more advanced 6 nm lithography process and a lower TDP of 8 Watts. These specifications suggest that the Dimensity 810 is more power-efficient and may generate less heat during operation, potentially leading to longer battery life for devices powered by this processor.
Another notable feature of the Dimensity 810 is its inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This component enhances the processor's ability to handle machine learning tasks and accelerate artificial intelligence-related computations. The Unisoc Tiger T700, unfortunately, does not have an NPU.
To summarize, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T700 in various ways. It offers higher clock speeds, a more advanced lithography process, lower power consumption, and the added benefit of an NPU for improved AI processing capabilities. Overall, the Dimensity 810 is more likely to provide a superior user experience in terms of performance, efficiency, and intelligent features.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This indicates that the Dimensity 810 may have a slight advantage in terms of raw processing power and overall performance due to higher clock speeds and a more powerful Cortex-A76 architecture.
Lithography and power consumption are significant factors in a processor's efficiency. The Unisoc Tiger T700 has a 12 nm lithography process and a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a more advanced 6 nm lithography process and a lower TDP of 8 Watts. These specifications suggest that the Dimensity 810 is more power-efficient and may generate less heat during operation, potentially leading to longer battery life for devices powered by this processor.
Another notable feature of the Dimensity 810 is its inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This component enhances the processor's ability to handle machine learning tasks and accelerate artificial intelligence-related computations. The Unisoc Tiger T700, unfortunately, does not have an NPU.
To summarize, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T700 in various ways. It offers higher clock speeds, a more advanced lithography process, lower power consumption, and the added benefit of an NPU for improved AI processing capabilities. Overall, the Dimensity 810 is more likely to provide a superior user experience in terms of performance, efficiency, and intelligent features.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 March |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Helio P65
3
MediaTek Helio G88 vs MediaTek Helio P60
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
6
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
7
Apple A10 Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 9611
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
10
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G