MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 are both powerful processors designed for smartphones. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it is built on a 12 nm lithography process and has a total of 8 cores. These cores are divided into two clusters, with two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. It uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watts. The Tiger T618 is equipped with an NPU (neural processing unit) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. It also has 8 cores, divided into two clusters. The Dimensity 810 features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz for high-performance tasks, along with six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Tiger T618, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and comes with an NPU. The Dimensity 810 boasts an impressive 12 billion transistors and has a lower TDP of 8 Watts, making it more power-efficient.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has an edge over the Unisoc Tiger T618 due to its more advanced lithography process, higher clock speed for high-performance tasks, and larger transistor count. The Dimensity 810 is likely to handle resource-intensive applications, multitasking, and gaming more smoothly than the Tiger T618.
However, it's important to note that raw specifications do not always reflect real-world performance. The overall performance of a processor also depends on factors such as software optimization, memory speeds, and the integration with other hardware components.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 are capable processors with their own strengths. The Tiger T618 may offer a balance between performance and power efficiency, while the Dimensity 810 leans more towards high-performance tasks and power efficiency.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it is built on a 12 nm lithography process and has a total of 8 cores. These cores are divided into two clusters, with two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. It uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watts. The Tiger T618 is equipped with an NPU (neural processing unit) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. It also has 8 cores, divided into two clusters. The Dimensity 810 features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz for high-performance tasks, along with six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Tiger T618, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and comes with an NPU. The Dimensity 810 boasts an impressive 12 billion transistors and has a lower TDP of 8 Watts, making it more power-efficient.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has an edge over the Unisoc Tiger T618 due to its more advanced lithography process, higher clock speed for high-performance tasks, and larger transistor count. The Dimensity 810 is likely to handle resource-intensive applications, multitasking, and gaming more smoothly than the Tiger T618.
However, it's important to note that raw specifications do not always reflect real-world performance. The overall performance of a processor also depends on factors such as software optimization, memory speeds, and the integration with other hardware components.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 are capable processors with their own strengths. The Tiger T618 may offer a balance between performance and power efficiency, while the Dimensity 810 leans more towards high-performance tasks and power efficiency.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Helio G35
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 7880
3
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 990
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
5
Google Tensor G1 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
7
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs MediaTek Helio P90
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 9810
10
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio P95