MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors that cater to different needs with their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it boasts a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it provides a decent balance of power and efficiency. The processor utilizes an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is built on a 12 nm lithography process. It has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its energy consumption during operation.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 showcases a different architecture. It features 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With similar core count to the Tiger T612, it offers a higher clock speed and potentially better performance. Like the Tiger T612, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set but is manufactured on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. Additionally, the Dimensity 810 impresses with its 12000 million transistors, indicating a significant increase in transistor density compared to the Tiger T612. Moreover, it has a lower TDP of 8 Watts, suggesting improved energy efficiency. Notably, the Dimensity 810 also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling artificial intelligence tasks.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 provides a solid performance with its architecture and core configuration, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 outshines it in several aspects. The Dimensity 810's higher clock speed, more advanced lithography process, higher transistor count, lower TDP, and additional NPU highlight its superior performance and efficiency. However, depending on the specific requirements and budget, the Tiger T612 may still be a viable option for those seeking a competent processor.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it boasts a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it provides a decent balance of power and efficiency. The processor utilizes an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is built on a 12 nm lithography process. It has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its energy consumption during operation.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 showcases a different architecture. It features 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With similar core count to the Tiger T612, it offers a higher clock speed and potentially better performance. Like the Tiger T612, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set but is manufactured on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. Additionally, the Dimensity 810 impresses with its 12000 million transistors, indicating a significant increase in transistor density compared to the Tiger T612. Moreover, it has a lower TDP of 8 Watts, suggesting improved energy efficiency. Notably, the Dimensity 810 also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling artificial intelligence tasks.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 provides a solid performance with its architecture and core configuration, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 outshines it in several aspects. The Dimensity 810's higher clock speed, more advanced lithography process, higher transistor count, lower TDP, and additional NPU highlight its superior performance and efficiency. However, depending on the specific requirements and budget, the Tiger T612 may still be a viable option for those seeking a competent processor.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio P65
3
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 990
4
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Helio G25
6
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
9
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
10
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712