MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two powerful processors, each with its own unique specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a good balance between speed and efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a TDP of 10 watts, it delivers reliable performance while maintaining energy efficiency.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, this processor offers a more advanced architecture. It features a 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, providing even higher speed capabilities. Like the Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 810 has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, making it more power efficient. With 12000 million transistors, it offers greater processing power and performance potential. Additionally, it comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing AI processing capabilities.
While both processors offer impressive specifications, there are some notable differences. The Dimensity 810 has a more advanced architecture with higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and a built-in NPU for AI processing. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 has a slightly higher TDP, indicating that it may consume more power.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user. If AI processing and power efficiency are important, the Dimensity 810 would be the preferred option. However, if a balance between speed, efficiency, and potentially lower costs is the priority, the Tiger T606 could be a suitable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a good balance between speed and efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a TDP of 10 watts, it delivers reliable performance while maintaining energy efficiency.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, this processor offers a more advanced architecture. It features a 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, providing even higher speed capabilities. Like the Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 810 has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, making it more power efficient. With 12000 million transistors, it offers greater processing power and performance potential. Additionally, it comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing AI processing capabilities.
While both processors offer impressive specifications, there are some notable differences. The Dimensity 810 has a more advanced architecture with higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and a built-in NPU for AI processing. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 has a slightly higher TDP, indicating that it may consume more power.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user. If AI processing and power efficiency are important, the Dimensity 810 would be the preferred option. However, if a balance between speed, efficiency, and potentially lower costs is the priority, the Tiger T606 could be a suitable choice.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
| TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 1 |
| Shaders | 32 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
| Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T606 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A9 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 vs Unisoc T8300
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs MediaTek Helio G100
5
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs Samsung Exynos 9820
7
Apple M4 (iPad) vs Samsung Exynos 990
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
9
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Apple A18 Pro