MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two powerful processors, each with its own unique specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a good balance between speed and efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a TDP of 10 watts, it delivers reliable performance while maintaining energy efficiency.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, this processor offers a more advanced architecture. It features a 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, providing even higher speed capabilities. Like the Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 810 has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, making it more power efficient. With 12000 million transistors, it offers greater processing power and performance potential. Additionally, it comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing AI processing capabilities.
While both processors offer impressive specifications, there are some notable differences. The Dimensity 810 has a more advanced architecture with higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and a built-in NPU for AI processing. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 has a slightly higher TDP, indicating that it may consume more power.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user. If AI processing and power efficiency are important, the Dimensity 810 would be the preferred option. However, if a balance between speed, efficiency, and potentially lower costs is the priority, the Tiger T606 could be a suitable choice.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features an architecture of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a good balance between speed and efficiency. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a TDP of 10 watts, it delivers reliable performance while maintaining energy efficiency.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, this processor offers a more advanced architecture. It features a 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, providing even higher speed capabilities. Like the Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 810 has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, making it more power efficient. With 12000 million transistors, it offers greater processing power and performance potential. Additionally, it comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing AI processing capabilities.
While both processors offer impressive specifications, there are some notable differences. The Dimensity 810 has a more advanced architecture with higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography, and a built-in NPU for AI processing. On the other hand, the Tiger T606 has a slightly higher TDP, indicating that it may consume more power.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user. If AI processing and power efficiency are important, the Dimensity 810 would be the preferred option. However, if a balance between speed, efficiency, and potentially lower costs is the priority, the Tiger T606 could be a suitable choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
2
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3
MediaTek Helio G25 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P95
5
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
6
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Google Tensor G1
7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs MediaTek Helio G85
8
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
9
Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 7420
10
MediaTek Helio G90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710