MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G features an architecture of 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, both processors have a 6 nm lithography, which indicates that they have a similar manufacturing process. This can result in better power efficiency and performance compared to older generation processors.
The Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt, while the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watt. A lower TDP generally indicates better power efficiency and less heat generation.
Both processors feature a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities. This can be beneficial for tasks like image recognition and voice assistants.
In terms of additional specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a higher number of transistors with 12000 million, which can contribute to better overall performance.
In conclusion, both the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 have similarities in terms of their architecture, instruction set, lithography, and NPU capabilities. However, the Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP, while the Dimensity 810 has a higher number of transistors. Depending on the specific use case and preferences, users can choose between these processors based on their priorities for power efficiency and overall performance.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G features an architecture of 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, both processors have a 6 nm lithography, which indicates that they have a similar manufacturing process. This can result in better power efficiency and performance compared to older generation processors.
The Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt, while the MediaTek Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watt. A lower TDP generally indicates better power efficiency and less heat generation.
Both processors feature a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI and machine learning capabilities. This can be beneficial for tasks like image recognition and voice assistants.
In terms of additional specifications, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a higher number of transistors with 12000 million, which can contribute to better overall performance.
In conclusion, both the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 have similarities in terms of their architecture, instruction set, lithography, and NPU capabilities. However, the Tanggula T770 5G has a lower TDP, while the Dimensity 810 has a higher number of transistors. Depending on the specific use case and preferences, users can choose between these processors based on their priorities for power efficiency and overall performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 6 |
Shaders | 32 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T770, Tiger T7520 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Apple A11 Bionic
2
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
3
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
4
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
6
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio G80
7
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
8
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Unisoc SC9863A
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
10
Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T616