MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The Unisoc SC7731E and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors with different specifications that are worth comparing.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core configuration with a maximum frequency of 1.3 GHz. The architecture of this processor is based on Cortex-A7, and it utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set. The lithography process used for manufacturing it is 28 nm, with a TDP of 7 Watt.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 offers a more powerful performance. It employs an octa-core setup, with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This processor is based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and utilizes a more advanced lithography process of 6 nm. It has an impressive 12 billion transistors, highlighting its advanced engineering. The TDP for this processor is slightly higher at 8 Watt. Additionally, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the device's capabilities in machine learning and AI-related tasks.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E with its 8 cores compared to the SC7731E's 4 cores. The Dimensity 810's use of two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores also signifies its ability to tackle more demanding tasks efficiently. Moreover, its advanced lithography process results in better power efficiency and performance gains compared to the SC7731E. The inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 810 further enhances its processing power for AI-related tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 clearly outshines the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of specifications. With its superior CPU cores, advanced lithography process, and NPU, the Dimensity 810 offers a higher level of performance and efficiency. It is a more suitable choice for demanding tasks and applications that require enhanced AI capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E.
Starting with the Unisoc SC7731E, it features a quad-core configuration with a maximum frequency of 1.3 GHz. The architecture of this processor is based on Cortex-A7, and it utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set. The lithography process used for manufacturing it is 28 nm, with a TDP of 7 Watt.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 offers a more powerful performance. It employs an octa-core setup, with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This processor is based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and utilizes a more advanced lithography process of 6 nm. It has an impressive 12 billion transistors, highlighting its advanced engineering. The TDP for this processor is slightly higher at 8 Watt. Additionally, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the device's capabilities in machine learning and AI-related tasks.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E with its 8 cores compared to the SC7731E's 4 cores. The Dimensity 810's use of two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores also signifies its ability to tackle more demanding tasks efficiently. Moreover, its advanced lithography process results in better power efficiency and performance gains compared to the SC7731E. The inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 810 further enhances its processing power for AI-related tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 clearly outshines the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of specifications. With its superior CPU cores, advanced lithography process, and NPU, the Dimensity 810 offers a higher level of performance and efficiency. It is a more suitable choice for demanding tasks and applications that require enhanced AI capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC7731E.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
2
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tiger T612
3
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio P35
4
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
6
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
7
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Helio G35
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695