MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
The MediaTek Dimensity 810 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two powerful processors with impressive specifications. Let's compare them to see their similarities and differences.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature 8 cores. However, they differ in terms of clock speeds and CPU architecture. The Dimensity 810 has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 930 boasts 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Dimensity 930 has a slight advantage in terms of CPU speed and architecture.
Moving on to other specifications, both processors are built on a 6 nm lithography process, indicating that they are power-efficient and provide improved performance. The number of transistors for the Dimensity 810 is 12,000 million, which is not specified for the Dimensity 930. While the Dimensity 810 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 8 watts, the Dimensity 930 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts.
Another important feature is the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables advanced AI capabilities. Both processors come equipped with NPUs, which allow for enhanced performance in AI tasks.
In conclusion, both the MediaTek Dimensity 810 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are powerful processors. While the Dimensity 930 has a slight advantage in terms of CPU speed and architecture, the Dimensity 810 has a lower TDP. Both processors are built on a 6 nm lithography process and feature NPUs, highlighting their capabilities in AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency or CPU performance.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, both processors feature 8 cores. However, they differ in terms of clock speeds and CPU architecture. The Dimensity 810 has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 930 boasts 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Dimensity 930 has a slight advantage in terms of CPU speed and architecture.
Moving on to other specifications, both processors are built on a 6 nm lithography process, indicating that they are power-efficient and provide improved performance. The number of transistors for the Dimensity 810 is 12,000 million, which is not specified for the Dimensity 930. While the Dimensity 810 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 8 watts, the Dimensity 930 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts.
Another important feature is the Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables advanced AI capabilities. Both processors come equipped with NPUs, which allow for enhanced performance in AI tasks.
In conclusion, both the MediaTek Dimensity 810 and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 are powerful processors. While the Dimensity 930 has a slight advantage in terms of CPU speed and architecture, the Dimensity 810 has a lower TDP. Both processors are built on a 6 nm lithography process and feature NPUs, highlighting their capabilities in AI tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power efficiency or CPU performance.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
| TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | |
| Shaders | 32 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 2K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2022 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
2
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
3
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Helio A25
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
5
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Google Tensor G5
6
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
7
Google Tensor G1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
9
MediaTek Helio G36 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
10
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G