MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The MediaTek Dimensity 810 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with impressive specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 features a combination of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a mix of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has a higher clock speed on its high-performance cores, which may result in better overall CPU performance.
Both processors have 8 cores in total and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Dimensity 810 is manufactured using a 6 nm process, while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a slightly more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography generally leads to better power efficiency and improved thermal performance.
The number of transistors is also a crucial factor in processor performance. The Dimensity 810 packs 12,000 million transistors, while the Dimensity 820's transistor count remains undisclosed. However, it is safe to assume that the Dimensity 820 may have a higher number of transistors, indicating potential enhancements in performance and efficiency.
Thermal Design Power (TDP) is an important metric to consider for power management. The Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watts, while the Dimensity 820 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Dimensity 820 might consume slightly more power, which is something to consider for device battery life.
Both processors include Neural Processing Units (NPU) to enhance AI processing capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 seems to offer a slight advantage over the Dimensity 810. With a higher clock speed on its high-performance cores, more advanced lithography, potentially more transistors, and slightly higher power consumption, the Dimensity 820 could provide improved overall performance and efficiency. However, real-world results may vary based on other factors like software optimization and device implementation.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 features a combination of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 boasts a mix of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has a higher clock speed on its high-performance cores, which may result in better overall CPU performance.
Both processors have 8 cores in total and utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
In terms of lithography, the Dimensity 810 is manufactured using a 6 nm process, while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a slightly more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography generally leads to better power efficiency and improved thermal performance.
The number of transistors is also a crucial factor in processor performance. The Dimensity 810 packs 12,000 million transistors, while the Dimensity 820's transistor count remains undisclosed. However, it is safe to assume that the Dimensity 820 may have a higher number of transistors, indicating potential enhancements in performance and efficiency.
Thermal Design Power (TDP) is an important metric to consider for power management. The Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watts, while the Dimensity 820 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Dimensity 820 might consume slightly more power, which is something to consider for device battery life.
Both processors include Neural Processing Units (NPU) to enhance AI processing capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 seems to offer a slight advantage over the Dimensity 810. With a higher clock speed on its high-performance cores, more advanced lithography, potentially more transistors, and slightly higher power consumption, the Dimensity 820 could provide improved overall performance and efficiency. However, real-world results may vary based on other factors like software optimization and device implementation.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 5 |
Shaders | 32 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | MT6875 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
2
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
4
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
5
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
6
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Apple A14 Bionic
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
8
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
9
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
10
Apple A10 Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 7870