MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors with different specifications that cater to various mobile devices in the market. Let's compare their key specifications to understand their differences.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features an architecture of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U boasts an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. From this, it is evident that the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for both its higher-performance and efficiency cores compared to the Tiger T700.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, offering sufficient multitasking capabilities. Moving on to the instruction set, they both support ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications available for mobile devices.
Lithography is an essential factor in the performance and power efficiency of a processor. The Unisoc Tiger T700 is manufactured on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800U benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 800U is likely to offer better power efficiency and potentially improved performance compared to the Tiger T700.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 800U boasts Neural Processing Unit (NPU) capabilities, which allows for AI-driven tasks and improved AI-assisted features on devices equipped with this processor. The Unisoc Tiger T700, however, does not mention any dedicated NPU in its specifications.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U emerges as the more powerful and efficient processor when compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. With higher clock speeds, a more advanced lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU, the Dimensity 800U can offer improved performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities in devices using this processor.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 features an architecture of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U boasts an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. From this, it is evident that the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for both its higher-performance and efficiency cores compared to the Tiger T700.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, offering sufficient multitasking capabilities. Moving on to the instruction set, they both support ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications available for mobile devices.
Lithography is an essential factor in the performance and power efficiency of a processor. The Unisoc Tiger T700 is manufactured on a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800U benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 800U is likely to offer better power efficiency and potentially improved performance compared to the Tiger T700.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 800U boasts Neural Processing Unit (NPU) capabilities, which allows for AI-driven tasks and improved AI-assisted features on devices equipped with this processor. The Unisoc Tiger T700, however, does not mention any dedicated NPU in its specifications.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U emerges as the more powerful and efficient processor when compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700. With higher clock speeds, a more advanced lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU, the Dimensity 800U can offer improved performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities in devices using this processor.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 48 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 March |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G80 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
2
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
3
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Apple A13 Bionic
4
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Helio P60
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Helio P90
7
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
8
Apple A10 Fusion vs Unisoc Tiger T610
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730