MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors that have their own unique specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it is based on an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, providing a good balance between power and efficiency. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (thermal design power) of this processor is set at 10 watts, which indicates its power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has a slightly different architecture. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a higher 2.4 GHz, along with 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc processor, it has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U boasts a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which generally indicates better efficiency and performance. Additionally, it has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of specifications, both processors offer a similar number of cores and support the same instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, indicating potentially better overall performance. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 800U also suggests better power efficiency. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 800U allows it to excel in AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and use cases. The Unisoc Tiger T610 could be a good option for those seeking a balance between power and efficiency, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800U could be more suitable for those prioritizing higher clock speeds and AI-related tasks.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it is based on an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, providing a good balance between power and efficiency. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (thermal design power) of this processor is set at 10 watts, which indicates its power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has a slightly different architecture. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a higher 2.4 GHz, along with 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc processor, it has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U boasts a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which generally indicates better efficiency and performance. Additionally, it has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of specifications, both processors offer a similar number of cores and support the same instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, indicating potentially better overall performance. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 800U also suggests better power efficiency. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 800U allows it to excel in AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and use cases. The Unisoc Tiger T610 could be a good option for those seeking a balance between power and efficiency, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800U could be more suitable for those prioritizing higher clock speeds and AI-related tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 48 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Helio P35
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
5
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio G70
7
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Helio G37
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Google Tensor G1
9
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710