MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors that have their own unique specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it is based on an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, providing a good balance between power and efficiency. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (thermal design power) of this processor is set at 10 watts, which indicates its power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has a slightly different architecture. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a higher 2.4 GHz, along with 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc processor, it has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U boasts a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which generally indicates better efficiency and performance. Additionally, it has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of specifications, both processors offer a similar number of cores and support the same instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, indicating potentially better overall performance. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 800U also suggests better power efficiency. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 800U allows it to excel in AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and use cases. The Unisoc Tiger T610 could be a good option for those seeking a balance between power and efficiency, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800U could be more suitable for those prioritizing higher clock speeds and AI-related tasks.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it is based on an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of 8 cores, providing a good balance between power and efficiency. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. The TDP (thermal design power) of this processor is set at 10 watts, which indicates its power consumption.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has a slightly different architecture. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a higher 2.4 GHz, along with 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc processor, it has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U boasts a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which generally indicates better efficiency and performance. Additionally, it has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in machine learning and AI tasks.
In terms of specifications, both processors offer a similar number of cores and support the same instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, indicating potentially better overall performance. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 800U also suggests better power efficiency. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 800U allows it to excel in AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and use cases. The Unisoc Tiger T610 could be a good option for those seeking a balance between power and efficiency, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800U could be more suitable for those prioritizing higher clock speeds and AI-related tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 48 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Samsung Exynos 850
2
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
6
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
7
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
10
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G