MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are both processors that offer powerful performance and efficiency for mobile devices. However, there are some key differences between the two in terms of their specifications.
Firstly, in terms of their CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U has a more powerful CPU configuration, with higher clock speeds on both core types. This can result in faster and more efficient multitasking and overall performance.
Additionally, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. The Tiger T606 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 800U has a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally translates to better power efficiency and heat management.
One notable feature that sets the Dimensity 800U apart is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component enhances the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks, such as advanced image processing or voice recognition. While the Tiger T606 does not have an NPU, it still offers high-performance capabilities suitable for everyday smartphone tasks.
In terms of power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Tiger T606 is 10 Watts. Unfortunately, information about the Dimensity 800U's TDP is not given. However, the 7 nm lithography of the Dimensity 800U suggests that it could have improved power efficiency compared to the Tiger T606.
Overall, both processors have their strengths and are well-suited for different tasks. The Dimensity 800U offers a more powerful CPU configuration and advanced AI capabilities, while the Tiger T606 provides reliable performance with a lower power consumption. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or application that they are being used for.
Firstly, in terms of their CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U has a more powerful CPU configuration, with higher clock speeds on both core types. This can result in faster and more efficient multitasking and overall performance.
Additionally, both processors support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications. The Tiger T606 has a lithography of 12 nm, while the Dimensity 800U has a more advanced 7 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally translates to better power efficiency and heat management.
One notable feature that sets the Dimensity 800U apart is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component enhances the processor's ability to handle AI-related tasks, such as advanced image processing or voice recognition. While the Tiger T606 does not have an NPU, it still offers high-performance capabilities suitable for everyday smartphone tasks.
In terms of power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Tiger T606 is 10 Watts. Unfortunately, information about the Dimensity 800U's TDP is not given. However, the 7 nm lithography of the Dimensity 800U suggests that it could have improved power efficiency compared to the Tiger T606.
Overall, both processors have their strengths and are well-suited for different tasks. The Dimensity 800U offers a more powerful CPU configuration and advanced AI capabilities, while the Tiger T606 provides reliable performance with a lower power consumption. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device or application that they are being used for.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 48 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
2
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs MediaTek Helio P35
4
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
5
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 7870
6
MediaTek Helio G35 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
7
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Samsung Exynos 9825