MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T310
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 4 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. In terms of manufacturing, it has a lithography of 12 nm.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U sports a more powerful CPU architecture. It is equipped with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor delivers improved performance compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. Similar to the Tiger T310, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set but boasts a more advanced lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 800U also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI and machine learning capabilities.
When comparing the specifications of these two processors, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 800U surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T310 in various aspects. The presence of powerful Cortex-A76 cores, additional cores, and a more advanced lithography contribute to improved overall performance. The inclusion of an NPU further sets the Dimensity 800U apart, enabling advanced AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that specifications alone do not provide a complete picture of the performance and efficiency of a processor. Real-world performance is influenced by various factors such as optimization, software compatibility, and other hardware components.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers decent performance with its 4 cores and 12 nm lithography, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outshines it with its 8 cores, advanced 7 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU. Consideration of these specifications, along with other factors, will help determine the suitability of each processor for specific use cases.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 4 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. In terms of manufacturing, it has a lithography of 12 nm.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U sports a more powerful CPU architecture. It is equipped with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor delivers improved performance compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. Similar to the Tiger T310, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set but boasts a more advanced lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 800U also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI and machine learning capabilities.
When comparing the specifications of these two processors, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 800U surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T310 in various aspects. The presence of powerful Cortex-A76 cores, additional cores, and a more advanced lithography contribute to improved overall performance. The inclusion of an NPU further sets the Dimensity 800U apart, enabling advanced AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that specifications alone do not provide a complete picture of the performance and efficiency of a processor. Real-world performance is influenced by various factors such as optimization, software compatibility, and other hardware components.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers decent performance with its 4 cores and 12 nm lithography, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outshines it with its 8 cores, advanced 7 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU. Consideration of these specifications, along with other factors, will help determine the suitability of each processor for specific use cases.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 2 |
| Shaders | 48 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Apple A10 Fusion
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
4
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
7
MediaTek Helio G70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
9
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Helio P35
10
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G