MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 4 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. In terms of manufacturing, it has a lithography of 12 nm.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U sports a more powerful CPU architecture. It is equipped with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor delivers improved performance compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. Similar to the Tiger T310, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set but boasts a more advanced lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 800U also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI and machine learning capabilities.
When comparing the specifications of these two processors, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 800U surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T310 in various aspects. The presence of powerful Cortex-A76 cores, additional cores, and a more advanced lithography contribute to improved overall performance. The inclusion of an NPU further sets the Dimensity 800U apart, enabling advanced AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that specifications alone do not provide a complete picture of the performance and efficiency of a processor. Real-world performance is influenced by various factors such as optimization, software compatibility, and other hardware components.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers decent performance with its 4 cores and 12 nm lithography, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outshines it with its 8 cores, advanced 7 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU. Consideration of these specifications, along with other factors, will help determine the suitability of each processor for specific use cases.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 4 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. In terms of manufacturing, it has a lithography of 12 nm.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U sports a more powerful CPU architecture. It is equipped with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor delivers improved performance compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. Similar to the Tiger T310, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set but boasts a more advanced lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 800U also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling enhanced AI and machine learning capabilities.
When comparing the specifications of these two processors, it is evident that the MediaTek Dimensity 800U surpasses the Unisoc Tiger T310 in various aspects. The presence of powerful Cortex-A76 cores, additional cores, and a more advanced lithography contribute to improved overall performance. The inclusion of an NPU further sets the Dimensity 800U apart, enabling advanced AI-related tasks.
However, it is worth noting that specifications alone do not provide a complete picture of the performance and efficiency of a processor. Real-world performance is influenced by various factors such as optimization, software compatibility, and other hardware components.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 offers decent performance with its 4 cores and 12 nm lithography, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outshines it with its 8 cores, advanced 7 nm lithography, and the addition of an NPU. Consideration of these specifications, along with other factors, will help determine the suitability of each processor for specific use cases.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 2 |
| Shaders | 48 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple M3 (iPad) vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio A22
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs MediaTek Helio G25
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400
7
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Helio P90
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G85
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
10
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695