MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors with distinct specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T740 5G features a quad-core Cortex-A75 clocked at 1.8 GHz, along with a quad-core Cortex-A55 also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U consists of a dual-core Cortex-A76 clocked at 2.4 GHz and a hexa-core Cortex-A55 clocked at 2.0 GHz. Both processors offer a total of 8 cores, with the Tanggula T740 5G having a more balanced distribution between its two core types.
In terms of instruction set, both processors adhere to the ARMv8.2-A architecture. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and ensures efficient performance.
When it comes to lithography, the Tanggula T740 5G is built on a 12 nm process, while the Dimensity 800U adopts a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 800U indicates that it is more power-efficient and capable of generating less heat compared to the Tanggula T740 5G.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Tanggula T740 5G boasts a dual NPU, providing enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U includes an NPU, but it does not specify whether it is dual or single.
Overall, the Dimensity 800U has a newer, more advanced lithography, potentially making it more energy-efficient and thermally efficient. However, the Tanggula T740 5G features a more balanced distribution of CPU cores and a dual NPU, which could make it a competitive choice for AI-related tasks.
It's important to note that while specifications provide valuable insights, real-world performance can also be influenced by other factors such as software optimization and overall system design. Therefore, it is recommended to consider these specifications alongside real-world benchmarks and reviews when making a decision on which processor best suits individual requirements.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T740 5G features a quad-core Cortex-A75 clocked at 1.8 GHz, along with a quad-core Cortex-A55 also clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U consists of a dual-core Cortex-A76 clocked at 2.4 GHz and a hexa-core Cortex-A55 clocked at 2.0 GHz. Both processors offer a total of 8 cores, with the Tanggula T740 5G having a more balanced distribution between its two core types.
In terms of instruction set, both processors adhere to the ARMv8.2-A architecture. This ensures compatibility with the latest software and ensures efficient performance.
When it comes to lithography, the Tanggula T740 5G is built on a 12 nm process, while the Dimensity 800U adopts a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 800U indicates that it is more power-efficient and capable of generating less heat compared to the Tanggula T740 5G.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Tanggula T740 5G boasts a dual NPU, providing enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U includes an NPU, but it does not specify whether it is dual or single.
Overall, the Dimensity 800U has a newer, more advanced lithography, potentially making it more energy-efficient and thermally efficient. However, the Tanggula T740 5G features a more balanced distribution of CPU cores and a dual NPU, which could make it a competitive choice for AI-related tasks.
It's important to note that while specifications provide valuable insights, real-world performance can also be influenced by other factors such as software optimization and overall system design. Therefore, it is recommended to consider these specifications alongside real-world benchmarks and reviews when making a decision on which processor best suits individual requirements.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | |
Shaders | 48 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Helio G90
2
Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
3
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Helio G25
4
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Apple A10 Fusion
6
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
9
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
10
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Helio G88