MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc SC9863A
The Unisoc SC9863A processor features an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has a total of 8 cores and operates on an ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography of this processor is 28 nm, and it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 3 Watts. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in processing data related to artificial intelligence tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U processor comes with an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc SC9863A, it has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a smaller lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. Like the SC9863A, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
In terms of performance, the presence of Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 800U suggests a higher potential for computational speed and efficiency compared to the SC9863A's Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 800U's smaller lithography also offers benefits such as improved power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds.
With an NPU in both processors, they are equipped to handle neural processing tasks efficiently. This means they can handle AI-related applications effectively, such as facial recognition, voice assistants, and image processing.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the differences lie in their architecture, lithography, and potential performance. The Unisoc SC9863A offers a higher number of Cortex-A55 cores but is manufactured on a larger 28 nm process. The MediaTek Dimensity 800U, on the other hand, has a more advanced 7 nm lithography and includes faster Cortex-A76 cores. Overall, the Dimensity 800U provides a greater advantage in terms of potential processing power and efficiency, making it a more promising option for demanding applications and tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U processor comes with an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc SC9863A, it has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a smaller lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. Like the SC9863A, it also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
In terms of performance, the presence of Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 800U suggests a higher potential for computational speed and efficiency compared to the SC9863A's Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 800U's smaller lithography also offers benefits such as improved power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds.
With an NPU in both processors, they are equipped to handle neural processing tasks efficiently. This means they can handle AI-related applications effectively, such as facial recognition, voice assistants, and image processing.
In summary, while both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the differences lie in their architecture, lithography, and potential performance. The Unisoc SC9863A offers a higher number of Cortex-A55 cores but is manufactured on a larger 28 nm process. The MediaTek Dimensity 800U, on the other hand, has a more advanced 7 nm lithography and includes faster Cortex-A76 cores. Overall, the Dimensity 800U provides a greater advantage in terms of potential processing power and efficiency, making it a more promising option for demanding applications and tasks.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 4 |
Shaders | 48 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio A25
2
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
5
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Helio P95
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
7
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
8
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Helio P70
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G95
10
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662