MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc SC7731E
When comparing the specifications of the Unisoc SC7731E and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors, several differences become apparent.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E features a quad-core configuration with four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U offers an octa-core setup with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Dimensity 800U's architecture provides a more powerful performance, especially with its higher clock speeds and a greater number of cores.
Another differentiating factor is their instruction set. The Unisoc SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 800U supports the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With the latter being more advanced, it is likely to offer better compatibility and optimizations for modern applications.
Examining the lithography, the Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm process, indicating a relatively older fabrication technology. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U boasts a 7 nm process, which represents a more efficient and power-saving design. The smaller lithography is generally associated with improved performance and energy efficiency.
One notable feature present in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component enhances machine learning capabilities and enables accelerated AI tasks. The Unisoc SC7731E, unfortunately, does not boast a similar neural processing feature.
Considering the specifications, it is clear that the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in various aspects. Its octa-core configuration, more advanced instruction set, smaller lithography, and inclusion of an NPU make it a more powerful and efficient processor overall. Thus, for those seeking a higher level of performance or advanced AI capabilities, the Dimensity 800U would be a better choice. However, for less demanding tasks or more budget-conscious consumers, the Unisoc SC7731E may still offer satisfactory performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC7731E features a quad-core configuration with four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U offers an octa-core setup with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Dimensity 800U's architecture provides a more powerful performance, especially with its higher clock speeds and a greater number of cores.
Another differentiating factor is their instruction set. The Unisoc SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, whereas the MediaTek Dimensity 800U supports the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With the latter being more advanced, it is likely to offer better compatibility and optimizations for modern applications.
Examining the lithography, the Unisoc SC7731E is built on a 28 nm process, indicating a relatively older fabrication technology. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U boasts a 7 nm process, which represents a more efficient and power-saving design. The smaller lithography is generally associated with improved performance and energy efficiency.
One notable feature present in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized component enhances machine learning capabilities and enables accelerated AI tasks. The Unisoc SC7731E, unfortunately, does not boast a similar neural processing feature.
Considering the specifications, it is clear that the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in various aspects. Its octa-core configuration, more advanced instruction set, smaller lithography, and inclusion of an NPU make it a more powerful and efficient processor overall. Thus, for those seeking a higher level of performance or advanced AI capabilities, the Dimensity 800U would be a better choice. However, for less demanding tasks or more budget-conscious consumers, the Unisoc SC7731E may still offer satisfactory performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 48 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio G85
2
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
3
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
4
Unisoc SC9863A vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Samsung Exynos 850
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
7
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
8
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100