MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
The MediaTek Dimensity 800U and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, it is built on a 7-nanometer lithography and features a CPU architecture that consists of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency. It also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling it to execute advanced instructions. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the device's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 is fabricated on a 6-nanometer lithography, making it more advanced than the Dimensity 800U in terms of manufacturing process. It features a CPU architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a slightly higher clock speed for its primary cores compared to the Dimensity 800U. Similar to the Dimensity 800U, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes an NPU.
One noticeable difference between the two processors is the power consumption. The Dimensity 800U does not provide information about its TDP (Thermal Design Power), whereas the Dimensity 930 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Dimensity 930 may consume more power during operation.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are both powerful processors with similar core configurations and instruction set support. The Dimensity 930, however, has a more advanced manufacturing process, higher clock speed for its primary cores, and a specified TDP. These specifications may indicate that the Dimensity 930 could offer better performance and efficiency compared to the Dimensity 800U, especially in power-demanding tasks.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, it is built on a 7-nanometer lithography and features a CPU architecture that consists of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor offers a balance between power and efficiency. It also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, enabling it to execute advanced instructions. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the device's ability to handle AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 is fabricated on a 6-nanometer lithography, making it more advanced than the Dimensity 800U in terms of manufacturing process. It features a CPU architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a slightly higher clock speed for its primary cores compared to the Dimensity 800U. Similar to the Dimensity 800U, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes an NPU.
One noticeable difference between the two processors is the power consumption. The Dimensity 800U does not provide information about its TDP (Thermal Design Power), whereas the Dimensity 930 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the Dimensity 930 may consume more power during operation.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are both powerful processors with similar core configurations and instruction set support. The Dimensity 930, however, has a more advanced manufacturing process, higher clock speed for its primary cores, and a specified TDP. These specifications may indicate that the Dimensity 930 could offer better performance and efficiency compared to the Dimensity 800U, especially in power-demanding tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | |
Shaders | 48 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 2K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2022 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
2
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs MediaTek Helio P90
3
Google Tensor G3 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
5
Apple A10X Fusion vs Unisoc Tiger T310
6
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
7
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio G96
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
9
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
10
MediaTek Helio G85 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980