MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The MediaTek Dimensity 800U and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors that offer high-performance capabilities. Both processors have a similar number of cores and instruction set, but they differ in terms of their CPU architecture, clock speeds, and additional specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, its CPU architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This processor uses ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 comes with a more powerful CPU architecture. It features 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Dimensity 800U, it also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its ability to handle higher power loads and potentially deliver better sustained performance. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI processing capabilities.
While both processors have the same number of cores and instruction set, the Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds compared to the Dimensity 800U. This higher clock speed may result in better performance and faster processing speeds, especially when handling demanding tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the MediaTek Dimensity 800U in terms of CPU architecture, clock speeds, and TDP. It is better suited for applications that require higher processing power and can potentially deliver more efficient and faster performance. However, both processors provide a solid foundation for smartphones and other devices that require reliable and high-performance processors.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, its CPU architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This processor uses ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 comes with a more powerful CPU architecture. It features 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Dimensity 800U, it also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its ability to handle higher power loads and potentially deliver better sustained performance. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI processing capabilities.
While both processors have the same number of cores and instruction set, the Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds compared to the Dimensity 800U. This higher clock speed may result in better performance and faster processing speeds, especially when handling demanding tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the MediaTek Dimensity 800U in terms of CPU architecture, clock speeds, and TDP. It is better suited for applications that require higher processing power and can potentially deliver more efficient and faster performance. However, both processors provide a solid foundation for smartphones and other devices that require reliable and high-performance processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 5 |
| Shaders | 48 | 80 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2020 May |
| Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | MT6875 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
2
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
3
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
4
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek MT6737
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Helio G81
7
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100
9
Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
10
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Unisoc Tiger T606