MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The MediaTek Dimensity 800U and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors that offer high-performance capabilities. Both processors have a similar number of cores and instruction set, but they differ in terms of their CPU architecture, clock speeds, and additional specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, its CPU architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This processor uses ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 comes with a more powerful CPU architecture. It features 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Dimensity 800U, it also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its ability to handle higher power loads and potentially deliver better sustained performance. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI processing capabilities.
While both processors have the same number of cores and instruction set, the Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds compared to the Dimensity 800U. This higher clock speed may result in better performance and faster processing speeds, especially when handling demanding tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the MediaTek Dimensity 800U in terms of CPU architecture, clock speeds, and TDP. It is better suited for applications that require higher processing power and can potentially deliver more efficient and faster performance. However, both processors provide a solid foundation for smartphones and other devices that require reliable and high-performance processors.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, its CPU architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This processor uses ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 comes with a more powerful CPU architecture. It features 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Dimensity 800U, it also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 820 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its ability to handle higher power loads and potentially deliver better sustained performance. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI processing capabilities.
While both processors have the same number of cores and instruction set, the Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds compared to the Dimensity 800U. This higher clock speed may result in better performance and faster processing speeds, especially when handling demanding tasks.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outperforms the MediaTek Dimensity 800U in terms of CPU architecture, clock speeds, and TDP. It is better suited for applications that require higher processing power and can potentially deliver more efficient and faster performance. However, both processors provide a solid foundation for smartphones and other devices that require reliable and high-performance processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 5 |
Shaders | 48 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | MT6875 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
2
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 7870
3
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
4
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
5
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
6
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
7
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Helio G95
8
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
9
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Google Tensor G1
10
Google Tensor G2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G