MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
The MediaTek Dimensity 800U and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two powerful processors with similar specifications, but a few differences set them apart.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors share the same architecture, featuring 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance on both devices.
Moving on to their lithography, the Dimensity 800U is built on a 7 nm process, while the Dimensity 810 is built on a smaller 6 nm process. This smaller node size can potentially result in improved power efficiency and better performance.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the Dimensity 810 boasts 12,000 million transistors, which is higher compared to the Dimensity 800U. This increased number of transistors can potentially enhance performance and overall processing capabilities.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watts, while the TDP of the Dimensity 800U is not specified. This lower TDP on the Dimensity 810 indicates that it may consume less power and generate less heat during operation.
Both processors feature Neural Processing Units (NPUs), which enhance the device's AI capabilities. This allows for faster and more efficient AI tasks such as image recognition and voice assistants.
Overall, the Dimensity 810 offers some improvements over the Dimensity 800U in terms of lithography, number of transistors, and TDP. These advancements may result in better power efficiency and overall performance. However, the Dimensity 800U still possesses a powerful CPU architecture and NPU, making it a solid choice for mid-range mobile devices.
In conclusion, while both processors share many similarities in terms of CPU architecture and NPU, the Dimensity 810 edges ahead with its smaller lithography, higher number of transistors, and potentially better power efficiency. However, the Dimensity 800U is still a strong contender, suitable for devices requiring mid-range performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors share the same architecture, featuring 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance on both devices.
Moving on to their lithography, the Dimensity 800U is built on a 7 nm process, while the Dimensity 810 is built on a smaller 6 nm process. This smaller node size can potentially result in improved power efficiency and better performance.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the Dimensity 810 boasts 12,000 million transistors, which is higher compared to the Dimensity 800U. This increased number of transistors can potentially enhance performance and overall processing capabilities.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watts, while the TDP of the Dimensity 800U is not specified. This lower TDP on the Dimensity 810 indicates that it may consume less power and generate less heat during operation.
Both processors feature Neural Processing Units (NPUs), which enhance the device's AI capabilities. This allows for faster and more efficient AI tasks such as image recognition and voice assistants.
Overall, the Dimensity 810 offers some improvements over the Dimensity 800U in terms of lithography, number of transistors, and TDP. These advancements may result in better power efficiency and overall performance. However, the Dimensity 800U still possesses a powerful CPU architecture and NPU, making it a solid choice for mid-range mobile devices.
In conclusion, while both processors share many similarities in terms of CPU architecture and NPU, the Dimensity 810 edges ahead with its smaller lithography, higher number of transistors, and potentially better power efficiency. However, the Dimensity 800U is still a strong contender, suitable for devices requiring mid-range performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 48 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G96
2
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Apple A11 Bionic
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G88
4
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
5
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
6
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Helio G90T