MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are both processors used in mobile devices. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a CPU architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. It has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography on this processor is 12 nm, which refers to the size of the transistors integrated into the chip. Additionally, the Tiger T710 includes dual NPUs for neural processing.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. It has a total of 4 cores and also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography on this processor is 7 nm, which indicates a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the Tiger T710. The Dimensity 800 includes an NPU for neural processing but does not specify if it is a dual NPU like the Tiger T710.
In terms of power consumption, the Dimensity 800 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, which is a measure of the maximum amount of heat generated by the processor during normal operation. The Tiger T710 does not provide a TDP value.
Overall, both processors have similar CPU architectures and instruction sets, but the Dimensity 800 has a more advanced 7 nm lithography compared to the Tiger T710's 12 nm lithography. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 has a specified TDP of 10 Watts, while the Tiger T710 does not provide this information. Both processors feature neural processing capabilities, with the Tiger T710 incorporating a dual NPU while the Dimensity 800 simply states the inclusion of an NPU. These specifications play a significant role in determining the overall performance and power efficiency of the processors in mobile devices.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a CPU architecture of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. It has a total of 8 cores and uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography on this processor is 12 nm, which refers to the size of the transistors integrated into the chip. Additionally, the Tiger T710 includes dual NPUs for neural processing.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. It has a total of 4 cores and also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography on this processor is 7 nm, which indicates a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the Tiger T710. The Dimensity 800 includes an NPU for neural processing but does not specify if it is a dual NPU like the Tiger T710.
In terms of power consumption, the Dimensity 800 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, which is a measure of the maximum amount of heat generated by the processor during normal operation. The Tiger T710 does not provide a TDP value.
Overall, both processors have similar CPU architectures and instruction sets, but the Dimensity 800 has a more advanced 7 nm lithography compared to the Tiger T710's 12 nm lithography. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 has a specified TDP of 10 Watts, while the Tiger T710 does not provide this information. Both processors feature neural processing capabilities, with the Tiger T710 incorporating a dual NPU while the Dimensity 800 simply states the inclusion of an NPU. These specifications play a significant role in determining the overall performance and power efficiency of the processors in mobile devices.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | |
| Shaders | 64 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 |
| Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 7904
2
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Helio G25
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
8
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
10
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Samsung Exynos 1380