MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors that offer different specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 features 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in 4 cores.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, which is the latest version of the ARM architecture.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T618 utilizes a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 employs a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography generally leads to better power efficiency and performance.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, meaning they consume the same amount of power under normal conditions.
Additionally, both processors come equipped with a neural processing unit (NPU), which is designed to handle artificial intelligence tasks and improve overall performance in AI-related applications.
Considering the specifications, it can be observed that the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a higher number of CPU cores compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800. However, the Dimensity 800 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, potentially offering better efficiency and performance. The choice between the two processors may depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user, such as the desired balance between power efficiency and processing power.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 features 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in 4 cores.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support ARMv8.2-A, which is the latest version of the ARM architecture.
Moving on to the lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T618 utilizes a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 employs a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography generally leads to better power efficiency and performance.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, meaning they consume the same amount of power under normal conditions.
Additionally, both processors come equipped with a neural processing unit (NPU), which is designed to handle artificial intelligence tasks and improve overall performance in AI-related applications.
Considering the specifications, it can be observed that the Unisoc Tiger T618 has a higher number of CPU cores compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800. However, the Dimensity 800 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, potentially offering better efficiency and performance. The choice between the two processors may depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user, such as the desired balance between power efficiency and processing power.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio G80
2
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
3
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs MediaTek Helio P60
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Apple A14 Bionic
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Unisoc SC7731E
7
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
8
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
9
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
10
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050