MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors commonly used in mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. While both processors offer high-performance capabilities, they differ in several key specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 boasts a configuration of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Despite having fewer cores, the Dimensity 800's higher-performance Cortex-A76 cores may provide better single-core performance for demanding tasks.
Moving on to instruction sets, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. This similarity allows for smooth multitasking and a seamless user experience.
Regarding lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is built on a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography signifies improved power efficiency and potentially better heat dissipation for the Dimensity 800, leading to greater overall performance and longer battery life.
The power consumption of both processors is rated at 10 Watts, indicating comparable energy efficiency. This helps devices equipped with these processors conserve power and prolong battery life, especially during prolonged usage or performance-intensive tasks.
One notable distinction between these processors lies in the Dimensity 800's inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU is specifically designed for artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and accelerates AI-related computations, enhancing performance in applications such as image recognition and voice assistants.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T616 offers a higher number of CPU cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 compensates with its higher-performance Cortex-A76 cores and advanced 7 nm lithography. Additionally, the Dimensity 800's inclusion of an NPU further improves its AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between performance, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 boasts a configuration of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Despite having fewer cores, the Dimensity 800's higher-performance Cortex-A76 cores may provide better single-core performance for demanding tasks.
Moving on to instruction sets, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications. This similarity allows for smooth multitasking and a seamless user experience.
Regarding lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is manufactured using a 12 nm process, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is built on a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography signifies improved power efficiency and potentially better heat dissipation for the Dimensity 800, leading to greater overall performance and longer battery life.
The power consumption of both processors is rated at 10 Watts, indicating comparable energy efficiency. This helps devices equipped with these processors conserve power and prolong battery life, especially during prolonged usage or performance-intensive tasks.
One notable distinction between these processors lies in the Dimensity 800's inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU is specifically designed for artificial intelligence (AI) tasks and accelerates AI-related computations, enhancing performance in applications such as image recognition and voice assistants.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T616 offers a higher number of CPU cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 compensates with its higher-performance Cortex-A76 cores and advanced 7 nm lithography. Additionally, the Dimensity 800's inclusion of an NPU further improves its AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between performance, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Apple A15 Bionic
3
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
6
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Unisoc SC7731E
7
MediaTek Helio G70 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Apple A10 Fusion
9
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Google Tensor G3
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000