MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors by their specifications, several key differences become apparent.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, giving it a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. Both processors utilize ARMv8.2-A instruction set architecture, ensuring enhanced processing capabilities.
Another significant difference lies in their lithography, which refers to the manufacturing process. The Unisoc Tiger T612 has a lithography of 12nm, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 boasts a more advanced 7nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 800 is more power-efficient and can deliver superior performance compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, indicating their ability to handle and dissipate heat effectively during operation. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has an additional feature known as Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU is responsible for enhancing AI-related tasks, such as voice recognition, image processing, and gaming performance, making the Dimensity 800 better suited for AI-intensive applications.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T612 in several key areas. With a more advanced 7nm lithography, it provides better power efficiency and overall performance. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU further boosts its AI processing capabilities, making it an excellent choice for users who require advanced AI functionalities. However, the Tiger T612 with its 12nm lithography and 8-core configuration can still deliver satisfactory performance for users with less demanding requirements.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, giving it a total of 8 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. Both processors utilize ARMv8.2-A instruction set architecture, ensuring enhanced processing capabilities.
Another significant difference lies in their lithography, which refers to the manufacturing process. The Unisoc Tiger T612 has a lithography of 12nm, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 boasts a more advanced 7nm lithography. This indicates that the Dimensity 800 is more power-efficient and can deliver superior performance compared to the Tiger T612.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, indicating their ability to handle and dissipate heat effectively during operation. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has an additional feature known as Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU is responsible for enhancing AI-related tasks, such as voice recognition, image processing, and gaming performance, making the Dimensity 800 better suited for AI-intensive applications.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T612 in several key areas. With a more advanced 7nm lithography, it provides better power efficiency and overall performance. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU further boosts its AI processing capabilities, making it an excellent choice for users who require advanced AI functionalities. However, the Tiger T612 with its 12nm lithography and 8-core configuration can still deliver satisfactory performance for users with less demanding requirements.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Samsung Exynos 990
2
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Helio G88
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
5
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Apple A11 Bionic
6
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Helio G95
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
8
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Apple A17 Pro
9
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B